SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Core GRADE 6: presenting the evidence in summary of findings tables
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Core GRADE 6: presenting the evidence in summary of findings tables (2025)Core GRADE 6: presenting the evidence in …Standardized mean differences in meta‐analysis: A tutorial (2024)Standardized mean differences…GRADE guidance 24 optimizing the integration of randomized and non-randomized studies of interventions in evidence syntheses and health guidelines (2021)GRADE guidance 24 optimizing …Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study (2020)Evaluating the credibility of…GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions (2019)GRADE guidelines 26: informat…Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect (2019)Choosing effect measures and …Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect (2017)Rating the certainty in evide…Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments (2016)Improving GRADE evidence tabl…Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects? A randomized survey across 8 countries (2015)Do clinicians understand the …GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes (2012)GRADE guidelines: 13. Prepari…GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes (2012)GRADE guidelines: 12. Prepari…Pooling health‐related quality of life outcomes in meta‐analysis—a tutorial and review of methods for enhancing interpretability (2011)Pooling health‐related qualit…Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes (2002)Issues in the selection of a …Can we individualize the ‘number needed to treat’? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses (2002)Can we individualize the ‘num…An empirical study of the effect of the control rate as a predictor of treatment efficacy in meta-analysis of clinical trials (1998)An empirical study of the eff…The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (1992)The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form He…Measuring health status in arthritis (1980)Measuring health status in ar…Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis (2007)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients (2015)Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness (1967)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014)A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to Change (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Optimal Strategies for Reporting Pain in Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews: Recommendations from an OMERACT 12 Workshop (2015)GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence (2017)Interventions to Promote Fundamental Movement Skills in Childcare and Kindergarten: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2017)A technique for measurement of attitudes (1932)A Basis for Scaling Qualitative Data (1944)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of Health-Related Quality of Life (1999)The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS): reliability, validity, and utilization. (2003)The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (2004)Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context. (2002)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2: A Generalised Linear Modelling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials (2011)Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions (2013)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria (2004)Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of suicide: a systematic review of observational studies (2009)The effects of psychotherapies for depression on response, remission, reliable change, and deterioration: A meta‐analysis (2021)Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme (2006)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Using systematic reviews in guideline development: The GRADE approach (2018)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample (2005)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)Association between overweight/obesity with depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, and body dissatisfaction in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (2020)A meta‐analysis of problem gambling risk factors in the general adult population (2021)Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis (2021)Scientific method: Statistical errors (2014)GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a minimally contextualised framework (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)GRADE Guidance 34: update on rating imprecision using a minimally contextualized approach (2022)Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. (2000)SF-36 Health Survey Update (2000)An Ultra-Brief Screening Scale for Anxiety and Depression: The PHQ-4 (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1992The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)30,026 cited
  • 2019GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions1,190 cited
  • 1980Measuring health status in arthritis1,182 cited
  • 2019Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect970 cited
  • 2012GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes836 cited
  • 2012GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes771 cited
  • 2017Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect700 cited
  • 2002Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes660 cited
  • 2002Can we individualize the ‘number needed to treat’? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses318 cited
  • 2011Pooling health‐related quality of life outcomes in meta‐analysis—a tutorial and review of methods for enhancing interpretability295 cited
  • 2020Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study261 cited
  • 1998An empirical study of the effect of the control rate as a predictor of treatment efficacy in meta-analysis of clinical trials217 cited
  • 2016Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

175 cited
  • 2021GRADE guidance 24 optimizing the integration of randomized and non-randomized studies of interventions in evidence syntheses and health guidelines174 cited
  • 2015Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects? A randomized survey across 8 countries107 cited
  • 2024Standardized mean differences in meta‐analysis: A tutorial96 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.