SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Dealing With Semantic Inconsistencies in AI Governance
12 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Dealing With Semantic Inconsistencies in AI Governance (2025)Dealing With Semantic Inconsistencies in …Normative Challenges of Risk Regulation of Artificial Intelligence (2024)Normative Challenges of Risk …AI Governance: A Systematic Literature Review (2024)AI Governance: A Systematic L…The Bureaucratic Challenge to AI Governance: An Empirical Assessment of Implementation at U.S. Federal Agencies (2023)The Bureaucratic Challenge to…Symbiosis, not alignment, as the goal for liberal democracies in the transition to artificial general intelligence (2023)Symbiosis, not alignment, as …Artificial intelligence in government: Concepts, standards, and a unified framework (2023)Artificial intelligence in go…AI governance: themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas (2023)AI governance: themes, knowle…Ethical, legal, social, and economic (ELSE) implications of artificial intelligence at a global level: a scientometrics approach (2022)Ethical, legal, social, and e…Bridging the gap: the case for an ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreement’ on AI policy (2021)Bridging the gap: the case fo…An Ontology for Standardising Trustworthy AI (2021)An Ontology for Standardising…Framing governance for a contested emerging technology:insights from AI policy (2020)Framing governance for a cont…Defining AI in Policy versus Practice (2020)Defining AI in Policy versus …Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019)Principles alone cannot guara…Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model (1991)AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations (2018)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment (2020)The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines (2020)Ethics of AI-Enabled Recruiting and Selection: A Review and Research Agenda (2022)How to Conduct a Mixed Methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature (2011)Exploratory Insights on Artificial Intelligence for Government in Europe (2020)The impact of automation and artificial intelligence on worker well-being (2021)Amazon Scraps Secret AI Recruiting Tool that Showed Bias against Women * (2022)The strategic use of AI in the public sector: A public values analysis of national AI strategies (2024)Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy‐Making (2000)Strategically constructed narratives on artificial intelligence: What stories are told in governmental artificial intelligence policies? (2022)What governs attitudes toward artificial intelligence adoption and governance? (2022)EU AI sovereignty: for whom, to what end, and to whose benefit? (2024)Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification (2018)The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (2020)Four investment areas for ethical AI: Transdisciplinary opportunities to close the publication-to-practice gap (2021)Responsible innovation ecosystems: Ethical implications of the application of the ecosystem concept to artificial intelligence (2021)Resolving the battle of short- vs. long-term AI risks (2023)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Successful Qualitative Research: A practical guide for beginners (2014)Ethical AI in Social Sciences Research: Are We Gatekeepers or Revolutionaries? (2025)Leveraging Blockchain for Ethical AI: Mitigating Digital Threats and Strengthening Societal Resilience (2025)The Changing Nature of Human-AI Relations: A Scoping Review on Terminology and Evolvement in the Scientific Literature (2025)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Ethics-based AI auditing: A systematic literature review on conceptualizations of ethical principles and knowledge contributions to stakeholders (2024)The EU's AI act: A framework for collaborative governance (2024)The governance of artificial intelligence in Canada: Findings and opportunities from a review of 84 AI governance initiatives (2024)Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions (1979)From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance (1997)Incentives and Organizations in the Public Sector: An Interpretative Review (2002)Agile and iterative governance: China’s regulatory response to AI (2025)A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE (1955)Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (2005)A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning (2021)Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Public Administration: An Overview of Top-Cited Articles and Practical Applications (2025)Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Public Administration: Challenges and Vulnerabilities (2025)Resolving value conflicts in public AI governance: A procedural justice framework (2025)Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI (2020)The Dark Sides of Artificial Intelligence: An Integrated AI Governance Framework for Public Administration (2020)A five-layer framework for AI governance: integrating regulation, standards, and certification (2025)AI integration in service delivery: enhancing business and sustainability performance amid challenges (2025)The Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Implementation of ESG-Oriented Sustainable Development Strategies in the Banking Sector: A Case Study (2026)How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms (2016)The Role of Financial Regulators in the Governance of Algorithmic Credit Scoring (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI1,869 cited
  • 2023AI governance: themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas319 cited
  • 2020Framing governance for a contested emerging technology:insights from AI policy244 cited
  • 2020Defining AI in Policy versus Practice129 cited
  • 2023Artificial intelligence in government: Concepts, standards, and a unified framework95 cited
  • 2024AI Governance: A Systematic Literature Review70 cited
  • 2022Ethical, legal, social, and economic (ELSE) implications of artificial intelligence at a global level: a scientometrics approach41 cited
  • 2024Normative Challenges of Risk Regulation of Artificial Intelligence36 cited
  • 2021Bridging the gap: the case for an ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreement’ on AI policy25 cited
  • 2023The Bureaucratic Challenge to AI Governance: An Empirical Assessment of Implementation at U.S. Federal Agencies24 cited
  • 2023Symbiosis, not alignment, as the goal for liberal democracies in the transition to artificial general intelligence20 cited
  • 2021An Ontology for Standardising Trustworthy AI13 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work