SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Writing is thinking
4 references·0 citing·15 second hop
Writing is thinking (2025)Writing is thinkingAI is transforming peer review — and many scientists are worried (2025)AI is transforming peer revie…Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT (2023)Fabrication and errors in the…Can Bard, Google’s Experimental Chatbot Based on the LaMDA Large Language Model, Help to Analyze the Gender and Racial Diversity of Authors in Your Cited Scientific References? (2023)Can Bard, Google’s Experiment…Could AI help you to write your next paper? (2022)Could AI help you to write yo…Citation Diversity Statement in BMES Journals (2021)A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education (2023)ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)AI hallucination: towards a comprehensive classification of distorted information in artificial intelligence-generated content (2024)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary (2025)Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)Use of artificial intelligence and the future of peer review (2024)Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals (2024)Beyond efficiency: How artificial intelligence (AI) will reshape scientific inquiry and the publication process (2025)Leveraging AI for Advancements in Qualitative Research Methodology (2025)The junkification of research (2025)Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond (2023)Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe? (2023)The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: The case of ChatGPT (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT489 cited
  • 2022Could AI help you to write your next paper?226 cited
  • 2025AI is transforming peer review — and many scientists are worried61 cited
  • 2023Can Bard, Google’s Experimental Chatbot Based on the LaMDA Large Language Model, Help to Analyze the Gender and Racial Diversity of Authors in Your Cited Scientific References?32 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work