Citation map · Study

The accuracy-bias trade-offs in AI text detection tools and their impact on fairness in scholarly publication

16 references·0 citing·41 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2023ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove868 cited
2023Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text577 cited
2021Transitioning to E-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have Higher Education Institutions responded to the challenge?529 cited
2013Open access: The true cost of science publishing524 cited
2023Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge420 cited
2023The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science412 cited
2020Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences399 cited
2023Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References397 cited
2023Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text387 cited
2001Attitudes of Journal Editors to Nonnative Speaker Contributions349 cited
2024Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis259 cited
2011English as an international language of scientific publication: a study of attitudes251 cited
2023Detection of GPT-4 Generated Text in Higher Education: Combining Academic Judgement and Software to Identify Generative AI Tool Misuse

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.