SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Google Scholar as a Resource for Systematic Reviews in Clinical Medicine
16 references·0 citing·41 second hop
Google Scholar as a Resource for Systematic Reviews in Clinical Medicine (2025)Google Scholar as a Resource for Systemat…Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review (2022)Using artificial intelligence…Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Which academic search systems…Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis (2018)Introduction to systematic re…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)Google Scholar to overshadow …Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature (2017)Suitability of Google Scholar…Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study (2017)Optimal database combinations…Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study (2016)Comparing the coverage, recal…Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents? (2016)Can we use Google Scholar to …The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The Role of Google Scholar in…The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study (2013)The expansion of Google Schol…Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews (2013)Is the coverage of google sch…Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews (2013)Google Scholar is not enough …Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough (2013)Google Scholar as replacement…Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals (2009)Comparisons of Citations in W…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey (2004)Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar (2007)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence (2014)Social desirability is the same in offline, online, and paper surveys: A meta-analysis (2014)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review (2019)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison (2018)Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? (2018)Big data and analytics in hospitality and tourism: a systematic literature review (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research (2019)The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research (2020)What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review (2020)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Number of Response Options, Reliability, Validity, and Potential Bias in the Use of the Likert Scale Education and Social Science Research: A Literature Review (2022)The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis (2023)Meta-analysis accelerator: a comprehensive tool for statistical data conversion in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2024)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Gamification in Science Education. A Systematic Review of the Literature (2021)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Reliability and Validity Assessment (1979)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques (2017)Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases (2019)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 2015The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching2,381 cited
  • 2019Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources2,361 cited
  • 2017Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study2,104 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories1,986 cited
  • 2009Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals819 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases686 cited
  • 2018Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis633 cited
  • 2017Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature486 cited
  • 2013Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews357 cited
  • 2013The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study270 cited
  • 2013Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough224 cited
  • 2022

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review
222 cited
  • 2016Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study202 cited
  • 2013Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews186 cited
  • 2016Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?183 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.