No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
In the last few years, the United Kingdom has been through much: a referendum and the subsequent departure from the European Union that ensued, the COVID-19 pandemic, the death of the monarch Queen Elizabeth II, and an ongoing cost of living crisis. This article delves into how the foreign press has framed the UK through these events. It focuses on the role of the politics of emotions by introducing the concepts of emotional ascription and emotional expectations, as well as incorporating humour in the conversation. Examining international media, the article finds two main ways the UK was discussed: pitied as a ‘broken’ and ‘depressed’ country and mocked as a ‘laughingstock’. The article argues that, to an extent, the UK’s desired self-conception as ‘Global Britain’ is subverted by these negative perceptions around the world, undermining its national image and contributing to weakening its soft power and status aspirations. Such a decline in reputation can negatively affect its ability to build and maintain strong and positive relations with ally countries. However, the article shows that the UK’s negative traits are primarily attributed to its politicians as opposed to its population or culture(s), so the country’s attractiveness does not decrease too significantly.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.