SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Guidance for umbrella reviews of observational studies: A scoping review
16 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Guidance for umbrella reviews of observational studies: A scoping review (2025)Guidance for umbrella reviews of observat…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2024)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E) (2024)A tool to assess risk of bias…Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement (2022)Reporting guideline for overv…Conducting umbrella reviews (2022)Conducting umbrella reviewsThe PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Risk and protective factors for mental disorders beyond genetics: an evidence‐based atlas (2021)Risk and protective factors f…Long-term outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: an umbrella review (2019)Long-term outcomes of childho…Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews (2018)Ten simple rules for conducti…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Summarizing systematic reviewsGuidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses (2009)Integration of evidence from …Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Strengthening the reporting o…An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings (2007)An exploratory test for an ex…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Social media use and its impact on adolescent mental health: An umbrella review of the evidence (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Introduction to Umbrella Reviews as a Useful Evidence-Based Practice (2023)The Role of Social Determinants of Health in Cardiovascular Diseases: An Umbrella Review (2023)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)AI Chatbots for Mental Health: A Scoping Review of Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Applications (2024)Allostatic Load and Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review (2025)Methodological Standards for Conducting High-Quality Systematic Reviews (2025)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Healthcare workers’ (HCWs) attitudes and related factors towards COVID-19 vaccination: a rapid systematic review (2021)ABC of a Scoping Review: A Simplified JBI Scoping Review Guideline (2024)Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation45,728 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,904 cited
  • 2024JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis2,762 cited
  • 2015Summarizing systematic reviews2,731 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,499 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2024A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)1,070 cited
  • 2022Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement896 cited
  • 2019Long-term outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: an umbrella review825 cited
  • 2007An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings756 cited
  • 2018Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews731 cited
  • 2009Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

718 cited
  • 2022Conducting umbrella reviews337 cited
  • 2021Risk and protective factors for mental disorders beyond genetics: an evidence‐based atlas322 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.