SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Fifty Years of Retracted Medical Publications From 1975 to 2024: A Comprehensive Analysis of Trends, Reasons, and Countries Using the Retraction Watch Database
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Fifty Years of Retracted Medical Publications From 1975 to 2024: A Comprehensive Analysis of Trends, Reasons, and Countries Using the Retraction Watch Database (2025)Fifty Years of Retracted Medical Publicat…Publish or perish: a study on academic misconduct in publishing among Chinese doctoral students (2025)Publish or perish: a study on…Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading (2023)Research Integrity: Where We …More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record (2023)More than 10,000 research pap…Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science (2022)Transparent, Open, and Reprod…Analysis of Retracted Publications in The Biomedical Literature from Turkey (2022)Analysis of Retracted Publica…Trends and Characteristics of Retracted Articles in the Biomedical Literature, 1971 to 2020 (2021)Trends and Characteristics of…Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills (2021)Retractions, Fake Peer Review…Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors (2021)Retracted articles in the bio…Research done wrong: A comprehensive investigation of retracted publications in COVID-19 (2021)Research done wrong: A compre…Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Open science saves lives: les…A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences (2020)A review of the current conce…Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication (2015)Publishing Ethics and Predato…Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication (2015)Preserving the Integrity of C…Data fraud in clinical trials (2015)Data fraud in clinical trialsSelf-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact (2014)Self-correction in biomedical…Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Has the Number of Scienti…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who publishes in “predatory” journals? (2014)A Scopus-Based Analysis of Publication Activity in Kazakhstan from 2010 to 2015: Positive Trends, Concerns, and Possible Solutions (2015)The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities (2016)Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: Falling in the predatory journals trap (2018)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors (2011)Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing (2012)Setting our bibliographic references free: towards open citation data (2015)Reporting Survey Based Studies – a Primer for Authors (2020)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)Exploratory Research (2020)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement (2018)Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies (2015)A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature (2021)Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices (2023)Detecting generative artificial intelligence in scientific articles: Evasion techniques and implications for scientific integrity (2023)Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges (2022)Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills (2022)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers (2020)Correction of scientific literature: Too little, too late! (2022)Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic (2022)Ethics in the authorship and publishing of scientific articles (2010)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)A mixed-methods survey and focus group study to understand researcher and clinician preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool (2024)Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2024)Analysis of Retracted Publications on Artificial Intelligence: Trends, Ethical Concerns, and Scientific Integrity (2025)Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors (2015)Evidence appraisal: a scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda (2017)The Evolution of Data Quality: Understanding the Transdisciplinary Origins of Data Quality Concepts and Approaches (2017)Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review (2024)Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
  • 2023More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record354 cited
  • 2021Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic251 cited
  • 2015Data fraud in clinical trials126 cited
  • 2021Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills80 cited
  • 2014Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact73 cited
  • 2015Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication69 cited
  • 2021Trends and Characteristics of Retracted Articles in the Biomedical Literature, 1971 to 202068 cited
  • 2023Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading64 cited
  • 2015Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication59 cited
  • 2020A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences57 cited
  • 2021Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors54 cited
  • 2021Research done wrong: A comprehensive investigation of retracted publications in COVID-1943 cited
  • 2022Analysis of Retracted Publications in The Biomedical Literature from Turkey36 cited
  • 2022

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science
35 cited
  • 2025Publish or perish: a study on academic misconduct in publishing among Chinese doctoral students25 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.