SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Academic misconduct and artificial intelligence use by medical students, interns and PhD students in Ukraine: a cross-sectional study
8 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Academic misconduct and artificial intelligence use by medical students, interns and PhD students in Ukraine: a cross-sectional study (2025)Academic misconduct and artificial intell…Is use of ChatGPT cheating? Students of health professions perceptions (2024)Is use of ChatGPT cheating? S…Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking? (2023)Is using ChatGPT cheating, pl…Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review (2023)Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI …Correction to: Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? (2023)Correction to: Can artificial…An overview of the capabilities of ChatGPT for medical writing and its implications for academic integrity (2023)An overview of the capabiliti…Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review (2022)Using artificial intelligence…Korean medical students’ attitudes toward academic misconduct: a cross-sectional multicenter study (2019)Korean medical students’ atti…Who would students ask for help in academic cheating? Cross-sectional study of medical students in Croatia (2014)Who would students ask for he…The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. (1994)What We Know About Cheating In CollegeLongitudinal Trends and Recent Developments (1996)Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research (2001)Escala de Autorrelato de Trapaça-Admissão: Evidências de Validade Fatorial e Precisão (2018)Investigating the existence of social networks in cheating behaviors in medical students (2018)The impact of gender and academic achievement on the violation of academic integrity for medical faculty students, a descriptive cross-sectional survey study (2019)Cheating by students (1994)Differences in medical students’ attitudes to academic misconduct and reported behaviour across the years—a questionnaire study (2003)Academic misconduct among medical students in a post‐communist country (2004)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)School Closures During Social Lockdown and Mental Health, Health Behaviors, and Well-being Among Children and Adolescents During the First COVID-19 Wave (2022)Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study (2023)Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study (2024)How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools (2024)A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview (2002)Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain (2010)ChatGPT: More Than a “Weapon of Mass Deception” Ethical Challenges and Responses from the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) Perspective (2023)Evaluating the authenticity of ChatGPT responses: a study on text-matching capabilities (2023)How effort expectancy and performance expectancy interact to trigger higher education students’ uses of ChatGPT for learning (2023)Leveraging the Potential of Generative AI to Accelerate Systematic Literature Reviews: An Example in the Area of Educational Technology (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Generative Artificial Intelligence, AI for Scientific Writing: A Literature Review (2024)Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT (2023)Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)The impact of guilt on student interactions with generative AI technology (2025)Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists (2023)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing (2023)Navigating the Ethical Terrain of AI-Generated Text Tools: A Review (2024)Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review (2024)Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal Reviewers (2025)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Editorial: Generative artificial intelligence as a plagiarism problem (2023)AI-assisted academic cheating: a conceptual model based on postgraduate student voices (2025)Exploring the Factors That Promote a Balance Between Academic Integrity and the Effective Use of GenAI Tools in Higher Education: A Systematic Review (2025)Relationship between the use of ChatGPT for academic purposes and plagiarism: the influence of student-related variables on cheating behavior. (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2022Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review222 cited
  • 2023Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking?175 cited
  • 2023Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review111 cited
  • 2023An overview of the capabilities of ChatGPT for medical writing and its implications for academic integrity47 cited
  • 2023Correction to: Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?38 cited
  • 2014Who would students ask for help in academic cheating? Cross-sectional study of medical students in Croatia32 cited
  • 2024Is use of ChatGPT cheating? Students of health professions perceptions26 cited
  • 2019Korean medical students’ attitudes toward academic misconduct: a cross-sectional multicenter study14 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work