SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reformation of science publishing: the Stockholm Declaration
9 references·0 citing·45 second hop
Reformation of science publishing: the Stockholm Declaration (2025)Reformation of science publishing: the St…The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform (2025)The misalignment of incentive…The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)The entities enabling scienti…Fake publications in biomedical science: red-flagging method indicates mass production (2025)Fake publications in biomedic…‘Stamp out paper mills’ — science sleuths on how to fight fake research (2025)‘Stamp out paper mills’ — sci…Evolving patterns of extreme publishing behavior across science (2024)Evolving patterns of extreme …How criminal science publishing gangs damage the genesis of knowledge and technology—a call to action to restore trust (2021)How criminal science publishi…Current market rates for scholarly publishing services (2021)Current market rates for scho…Gaming the Metrics (2020)Gaming the MetricsWhat factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality? (2011)What factors determine citati…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology (2013)Citations increase with manuscript length, author number, and references cited in ecology journals (2016)Exploratory Research (2020)Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)The raw truth about paper mills (2021)Bibliometric development of Naunyn–Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology (2022)How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem (2024)Retracted papers originating from paper mills: a cross-sectional analysis of references and citations (2024)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges (2021)Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals (2022)Replacing academic journals (2023)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge (2023)Surge in number of ‘extremely productive’ authors concerns scientists (2023)Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators including retraction data (2024)Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors (2025)China's Publication Bazaar (2013)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)False authorship: an explorative case study around an AI-generated article published under my name (2025)Gaming the metrics: bibliometric anomalies in global university rankings and the research integrity risk index (RI2) (2025)Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology (2019)Exploring the Dilemma of AI Use in Medical Research and Knowledge Synthesis: A Perspective on Deep Research Tools (2025)Journals Operating Predatory Practices Are Systematically Eroding the Science Ethos: A Gate and Code Strategy to Minimise Their Operating Space and Restore Research Best Practice (2025)Open access publishing in an African context: Notable improvements and recurring challenges (2025)Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments (2000)The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior (2003)Dramatic increases in redundant publications in the Generative AI era (2025)Estimating the predictability of questionable open-access journals (2025)Open science and transparency are our strongest tools in the fight against fraudulent publishing activities (2025)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Global retractions due to randomly generated content: Characterization and trends (2024)How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess (2020)How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists (2020)Better Living through Coordination Chemistry: A descriptive study of a prolific papermill that combines crystallography and medicine (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?242 cited
  • 2020Gaming the Metrics200 cited
  • 2025The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly128 cited
  • 2021Current market rates for scholarly publishing services63 cited
  • 2025‘Stamp out paper mills’ — science sleuths on how to fight fake research59 cited
  • 2025The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform55 cited
  • 2024Evolving patterns of extreme publishing behavior across science54 cited
  • 2025Fake publications in biomedical science: red-flagging method indicates mass production51 cited
  • 2021How criminal science publishing gangs damage the genesis of knowledge and technology—a call to action to restore trust27 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work