SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Epistemic Downside of Using LLM-Based Generative AI in Academic Writing
16 references·0 citing·54 second hopsampled
The Epistemic Downside of Using LLM-Based Generative AI in Academic Writing (2025)The Epistemic Downside of Using LLM-Based…The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers (2025)The Impact of Generative AI o…Quantifying large language model usage in scientific papers (2025)Quantifying large language mo…Is it OK for AI to write science papers? Nature survey shows researchers are split (2025)Is it OK for AI to write scie…Explosion of formulaic research articles, including inappropriate study designs and false discoveries, based on the NHANES US national health database (2025)Explosion of formulaic resear…Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary (2025)Delving into LLM-assisted wri…Delegation to artificial intelligence can increase dishonest behaviour (2025)Delegation to artificial inte…AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking (2025)AI Tools in Society: Impacts …Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content (2024)Generative AI enhances indivi…From tools to threats: a reflection on the impact of artificial-intelligence chatbots on cognitive health (2024)From tools to threats: a refl…Experts or Authorities? The Strange Case of the Presumed Epistemic Superiority of Artificial Intelligence Systems (2024)Experts or Authorities? The S…Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)Artificial intelligence and i…AI hallucination: towards a comprehensive classification of distorted information in artificial intelligence-generated content (2024)AI hallucination: towards a c…The use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native english speakers (2023)The use of artificial intelli…The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology (2023)The ethics of ChatGPT – Explo…Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing (2023)Can linguists distinguish bet…AI as an Epistemic Technology (2023)AI as an Epistemic TechnologyQualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (1988)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines (2020)Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review (2023)Assessing the nexus of Generative AI adoption, ethical considerations and organizational performance (2024)Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement (2024)Epistemic Injustice (2007)Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing (2007)CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA (2012)Artificial Epistemic Authorities (2025)When and how to disclose AI use in academic publishing: AMEE Guide No.192 (2025)An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (2017)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)Exploring User Adoption of ChatGPT: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective (2024)Using large language models to generate silicon samples in consumer and marketing research: Challenges, opportunities, and guidelines (2024)The dominance of English in the international scientific periodical literature and the future of language use in science (2007)AI-Based Modeling: Techniques, Applications and Research Issues Towards Automation, Intelligent and Smart Systems (2022)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)A review of top cardiology and cardiovascular medicine journal guidelines regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in scientific writing (2024)Artificial intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT involvement in scientific and medical writing, a new concern for researchers. A scoping review (2024)Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review: Enhancing Efficiency While Preserving Integrity (2025)Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective (1988)Situated Learning (1991)REFORMS: Consensus-based Recommendations for Machine-learning-based Science (2024)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the research process – A survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions (2025)Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. (1982)AI and Its Impact on Creativity and Diversity: An Empirical Study of LLM-Generated Product Ideas (2023)Art and the science of generative AI (2023)Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence (2023)Establishing the importance of co-creation and self-efficacy in creative collaboration with artificial intelligence (2024)Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology (2006)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review (2020)Generative AI risks and resilience: How users adapt to hallucination and privacy challenges (2025)The Paradox of Ethical AI-Assisted Research (2025)To use or not to use? Generative AI adoption in Chinese business schools (2025)Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning (1988)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics (2014)AI Anxiety: a comprehensive analysis of psychological factors and interventions (2025)Cognitive offloading or cognitive overload? How AI alters the mental architecture of coping (2025)Students’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Use in Academic Writing in English as a Foreign Language (2025)How we think. (1910)Basics of Qualitative Research (1992)Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research (2020)AI deskilling is a structural problem (2025)Biases in AI: acknowledging and addressing the inevitable ethical issues (2025)From Offloading to Engagement: An Experimental Study on Structured Prompting and Critical Reasoning with Generative AI (2025)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT (2023)Resisting the Algorithmic Management of Science: Craft and Community After Generative AI (2024)Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus (2026)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2025AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking1,199 cited
  • 2024Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content958 cited
  • 2024Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research699 cited
  • 2025The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers543 cited
  • 2023The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology474 cited
  • 2024AI hallucination: towards a comprehensive classification of distorted information in artificial intelligence-generated content321 cited
  • 2023Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing260 cited
  • 2025Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary205 cited
  • 2023The use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native english speakers158 cited
  • 2023AI as an Epistemic Technology137 cited
  • 2025Is it OK for AI to write science papers? Nature survey shows researchers are split100 cited
  • 2025Explosion of formulaic research articles, including inappropriate study designs and false discoveries, based on the NHANES US national health database95 cited
  • 2024From tools to threats: a reflection on the impact of artificial-intelligence chatbots on cognitive health

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

93 cited
  • 2025Quantifying large language model usage in scientific papers79 cited
  • 2024Experts or Authorities? The Strange Case of the Presumed Epistemic Superiority of Artificial Intelligence Systems63 cited
  • 2025Delegation to artificial intelligence can increase dishonest behaviour50 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.