SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The hazards of using hazard ratios from proportional hazard models in indirect treatment comparisons
15 references·0 citing·42 second hopsampled
The hazards of using hazard ratios from proportional hazard models in indirect treatment comparisons (2025)The hazards of using hazard ratios from p…Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments (2024)Twenty years of network meta‐…IPDfromKM: reconstruct individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves (2021)IPDfromKM: reconstruct indivi…Multilevel Network Meta-Regression for Population-Adjusted Treatment Comparisons (2020)Multilevel Network Meta-Regre…Comparison of Methods for Estimating Therapy Effects by Indirect Comparisons: A Simulation Study (2020)Comparison of Methods for Est…Population Adjustment Methods for Indirect Comparisons: A Review of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals (2019)Population Adjustment Methods…Assessing the impact of a matching‐adjusted indirect comparison in a Bayesian network meta‐analysis (2019)Assessing the impact of a mat…Methods for Population-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal (2017)Methods for Population-Adjust…Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers (2013)Is network meta-analysis as v…Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis (2013)Conceptual and Technical Chal…Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)Indirect and mixed‐treatment …No Head-to-Head Trial? Simulate the Missing Arms (2010)No Head-to-Head Trial? Simula…Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality (2010)Indirect Comparisons: A Revie…A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered (2009)A case study of multiple-trea…Indirect comparisons of competing interventions (2005)Indirect comparisons of compe…Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses (2003)Validity of indirect comparis…How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2016)Network meta-analysis: a technique to gather evidence from direct and indirect comparisons (2017)Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata (2017)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Waiting list may be a nocebo condition in psychotherapy trials: a contribution from network meta‐analysis (2014)Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians (2016)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review (2013)Characteristics of Networks of Interventions: A Description of a Database of 186 Published Networks (2014)Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015 (2016)The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (2002)Assessing key assumptions of network meta‐analysis: a review of methods (2013)Comparative Efficacy of Seven Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Patients with Depression: A Network Meta-Analysis (2013)Network Meta-Analysis (2020)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses (2009)Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4 (2013)Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Assessing the performance of population adjustment methods for anchored indirect comparisons: A simulation study (2020)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Theory and practice of Bayesian and frequentist frameworks for network meta-analysis (2022)Journal of the American Statistical Association (1995)Analysing and Presenting Results (2010)Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves (2012)Synthetizing Published Evidence on Survival by Reconstruction of Patient-Level Data and Generation of a Multi-Trial Kaplan-Meier Curve (2021)A Method for Reconstructing Individual Patient Data From Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves That Incorporate Marked Censoring Times (2022)KMSubtraction: reconstruction of unreported subgroup survival data utilizing published Kaplan-Meier survival curves (2022)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods (2015)Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons (2006)Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1 (2011)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2012Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool1,722 cited
  • 2013Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis1,071 cited
  • 2003Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses944 cited
  • 2021IPDfromKM: reconstruct individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves839 cited
  • 2005Indirect comparisons of competing interventions680 cited
  • 2013Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers656 cited
  • 2017Methods for Population-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal398 cited
  • 2009A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered302 cited
  • 2020Multilevel Network Meta-Regression for Population-Adjusted Treatment Comparisons181 cited
  • 2010Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality145 cited
  • 2019Population Adjustment Methods for Indirect Comparisons: A Review of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals108 cited
  • 2024Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments101 cited
  • 2010No Head-to-Head Trial? Simulate the Missing Arms

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

96 cited
  • 2020Comparison of Methods for Estimating Therapy Effects by Indirect Comparisons: A Simulation Study18 cited
  • 2019Assessing the impact of a matching‐adjusted indirect comparison in a Bayesian network meta‐analysis10 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.