Real World Performance of Approximate String Comparators for use in Patient Matching

Abstract

Medical record linkage is becoming increasingly important as clinical data is distributed across independent sources. To improve linkage accuracy we studied different name comparison methods that establish agreement or disagreement between corresponding names. In addition to exact raw name matching and exact phonetic name matching, we tested three approximate string comparators. The approximate comparators included the modified Jaro-Winkler method, the longest common substring, and the Levenshtein edit distance. We also calculated the combined root-mean square of all three. We tested each name comparison method using a deterministic record linkage algorithm. Results were consistent across both hospitals. At a threshold comparator score of 0.8, the Jaro-Winkler comparator achieved the highest linkage sensitivities of 97.4% and 97.7%. The combined root-mean square method achieved sensitivities higher than the Levenshtein edit distance or long-est common substring while sustaining high linkage specificity. Approximate string comparators increase deterministic linkage sensitivity by up to 10% compared to exact match comparisons and represent an accurate method of linking to vital statistics data.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 60 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.