SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Empirical Evidence of Associations Between Trial Quality and Effect Size
0 references·4 citing·14 second hop
Empirical Evidence of Associations Between Trial Quality and Effect Size (2011)Empirical Evidence of Associations Betwee…The influence of bias in randomized controlled trials on rehabilitation intervention effect estimates: what we have learned from meta-epidemiological studies (2023)The influence of bias in rand…The effect of self-confidence on performance in sports: a meta-analysis and narrative review (2023)The effect of self-confidence…The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression (2015)The effect of journal impact …Quality improvement needed in quality improvement randomised trials: systematic review of interventions to improve care in diabetes (2013)Quality improvement needed in…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Contacting authors by telephone increased response proportions compared with emailing: results of a randomized study (2019)A power primer. (1992)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. (1977)Stress, appraisal, and coping (1985)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Pre-Event Self-Efficacy and Sports Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis (2023)The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials (1998)Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research (2002)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2023The effect of self-confidence on performance in sports: a meta-analysis and narrative review48 cited
  • 2013Quality improvement needed in quality improvement randomised trials: systematic review of interventions to improve care in diabetes20 cited
  • 2015The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression17 cited
  • 2023The influence of bias in randomized controlled trials on rehabilitation intervention effect estimates: what we have learned from meta-epidemiological studies14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work