Article2001

The Intangible Costs and Benefits of Computer Investments: Evidence from the Financial Markets

136 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis Economic Growth and Productivity Information Technology Governance and Strategy

Abstract

We show how the financial market valuation of firms can be used to estimate the intangible costs and benefits of computer capital and we present several new empirical results based on this model. Using eight years of data for 820 non-financial firms in the United States, we find that an increase of one dollar in the quantity of computer capital installed by a firm is associated with an increase of about ten dollars in the financial markets' valuation of the firm. Other forms of capital do not exhibit these high valuations. Our model suggests that adjustment costs and intangible assets may provide an explanation for the high market valuation found for computers in this study as well as the high returns found for computer capital in firm-level productivity studies. Costly investments in software, training and organizational transformations that accompany computer investments can be regarded as creating intangible assets. These intangible assets do not appear on firms' conventional balance sheets but they can produce both higher market valuations and apparent "excess" returns. The empirical evidence suggests that the vast majority of the costs and benefits of computerization are embodied in otherwise unobserved intangible assets. We thank Brownyn Hall, Robert Hall, Lorin Hitt, Stephen Oliner, and participants of NBER Productivity Seminar for valuable comments. The National Science Foundation, the MIT Center for Coordination Science, the Stanford Computer Industry Project, NationsBanc Montgomery Securities and IBM Research provided generous financial support and International Data Group and Computer Intelligence Corporation provided valuable data. The authors are responsible for any remaining errors. This paper subsumes a previous version that was presented at the Internat...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 136 citations exist upstream.

References

1993Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution 1969A General Equilibrium Approach To Monetary Theory 2010Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods 2002Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence 1982Tobin's Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical Interpretation 1987Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies 1990Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate 1995General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’?

Cited by

2006Intangible Capital and Economic Growth 2003Exploding Productivity Growth: Context, Causes, and Implications 2000E-Capital: The Link between the Stock Market and the Labor Market in the 1990s 2000Understanding Digital Technology’s Evolution and the Path of Measured Productivity Growth: Present and Future in the Mirror of the Past 2009Sequential Adoption Theory: A Theory for Understanding Herding Behavior in Early Adoption of Novel Technologies

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.