References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2004Peer Review Verfahren auf dem Prüfstand / Peer Review Research – Reviewed84 cited
• 1990What Can and Should Be Done to Reduce Publication Bias?82 cited
• 2009Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity77 cited
• 1995The postgutenberg galaxy: How to get there from here70 cited
• 1996Cognitive Technology - In Search of a Humane Interface62 cited
• 2007Peer review as professional responsibility: A quality control system only as good as the participants60 cited
• 1991Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review55 cited
• 2000Integrating, Navigating and Analyzing Eprint Archives Through Open Citation Linking (the OpCit Project)47 cited
• 2017Peer Review: From “Sacred Ideals” to “Profane Realities”46 cited
• 1992Interactive Publication: Extending the American Physical Society's Discipline-Specific Model for Electronic Publishing46 cited
• 2015Citizens, Consumers and Animals: What Role do Experts Assign to Public Values in Establishing Animal Welfare Standards?32 cited
• 2014How Editors Decide. Oral Communication in Journal Peer Review30 cited
• 2001Practising Peer Review in Organizations: A Qualifier for Knowledge Dissemination and Legitimization25 cited