SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Punishing Persistent OffendersExploring Community and Offender Perspectives
0 references·6 citing·24 second hop
Punishing Persistent OffendersExploring Community and Offender Perspectives (2008)Punishing Persistent OffendersExploring C…Punishment and Human Dignity: Sentencing Principles for Twenty-First-Century America (2018)Punishment and Human Dignity:…Paying for the Past: The Role of Previous Convictions at Sentencing in the Crown Court (2015)Paying for the Past: The Role…Expanding the scope of sentencing research: Determinants of juvenile and adult punishment in the Netherlands (2015)Expanding the scope of senten…Using Jurors to Explore Public Attitudes to Sentencing (2011)Using Jurors to Explore Publi…Public preferences for sentencing purposes: What difference does offender age, criminal history and offence type make? (2011)Public preferences for senten…Custody or community? Exploring the boundaries of public punitiveness in England and Wales (2011)Custody or community? Explori…Prejudice, Discrimination and Racism (1988)An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial Discretion (1991)THE INTERACTION OF RACE, GENDER, AND AGE IN CRIMINAL SENTENCING: THE PUNISHMENT COST OF BEING YOUNG, BLACK, AND MALE (1998)The Criminal Case Processing of Foreign Nationals in the Netherlands (2020)Three Strikes and You Are Out, but Why? The Psychology of Public Support for Punishing Rule Breakers (1997)Beyond populist punitiveness? (2005)Understanding Public Attitudes to Criminal Justice (2005)Measuring jurors’ views on sentencing: Results from the second Australian jury sentencing study (2016)Punitiveness Beyond Criminal Justice: Punishable and Punitive Subjects in an Era of Prevention, Anti-Migration and Austerity (2019)Juror and community views of the guilty plea sentencing discount: Findings from a national Australian study (2020)How Effective Are the Things People Say to Apologize? Effects of the Realization of the Apology Speech Act (1997)Mitigation: the role of personal factors in sentencing (2007)The public sense of justice in Scandinavia: A study of attitudes towards punishments (2015)Americans View Crime and Justice: A National Public Opinion Survey (1996)Sentencing and Criminal Justice (2005)Penal populism, sentencing councils and sentencing policy (2014)Stakeholder Sentencing (2014)Why sentence? Comparing the views of jurors, judges and the legislature on the purposes of sentencing in Victoria, Australia (2017)Sentencing - Theory, Law and Practice (1985)The Psychology of Judicial Sentencing (1986)Sentencing and Criminal Justice (2010)Two Concepts of Rules (1955)Justice as Fairness (1958)Philosophy and Public Affairs (2000)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2011Using Jurors to Explore Public Attitudes to Sentencing52 cited
  • 2011Custody or community? Exploring the boundaries of public punitiveness in England and Wales51 cited
  • 2015Expanding the scope of sentencing research: Determinants of juvenile and adult punishment in the Netherlands29 cited
  • 2011Public preferences for sentencing purposes: What difference does offender age, criminal history and offence type make?27 cited
  • 2015Paying for the Past: The Role of Previous Convictions at Sentencing in the Crown Court25 cited
  • 2018Punishment and Human Dignity: Sentencing Principles for Twenty-First-Century America19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work