A Survey of Judges' Responses to Simulated Legal Cases: Research Note on Sentencing Disparity

William Austin

47 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Jury Decision Making Processes Legal processes and jurisprudence Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

Abstract

William Austin, Thomas A. Williams, III, A Survey of Judges' Responses to Simulated Legal Cases: Research Note on Sentencing Disparity, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), Vol. 68, No. 2 (Jun., 1977), pp. 306-310

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 47 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1999Measuring Interjudge Sentencing Disparity: Before and After the Federal Sentencing Guidelines 2015Free at Last? Judicial Discretion and Racial Disparities in Federal Sentencing 2003Handbook of psychology in legal contexts 2018Trust in Public Policy Algorithms 1984Legal Justice and the Psychology of Conflict Resolution 2022To differ is human: A reflective commentary on “Noise. A Flaw in Human Judgment”, by D. Kahneman, O. Sibony & C.R. Sunstein (2021). London: William Collins 2004Contrastive analysis of verdicts, cognitive activity, reasoning and information-processing in judicial judgements

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.