SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Survey of Judges' Responses to Simulated Legal Cases: Research Note on Sentencing Disparity
0 references·8 citing·40 second hop
A Survey of Judges' Responses to Simulated Legal Cases: Research Note on Sentencing Disparity (1977)A Survey of Judges' Responses to Simulate…To differ is human: A reflective commentary on “Noise. A Flaw in Human Judgment”, by D. Kahneman, O. Sibony & C.R. Sunstein (2021). London: William Collins (2022)To differ is human: A reflect…Trust in Public Policy Algorithms (2018)Trust in Public Policy Algori…Using vignette methodology to research the process of breach comparatively (2015)Using vignette methodology to…Free at Last? Judicial Discretion and Racial Disparities in Federal Sentencing (2015)Free at Last? Judicial Discre…Contrastive analysis of verdicts, cognitive activity, reasoning and information-processing in judicial judgements (2004)Contrastive analysis of verdi…Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (2003)Handbook of psychology in leg…Measuring Interjudge Sentencing Disparity: Before and After the Federal Sentencing Guidelines (1999)Measuring Interjudge Sentenci…Legal Justice and the Psychology of Conflict Resolution (1984)Legal Justice and the Psychol…The ecology of human development : experiments by nature and design (1979)A General Theory of Crime (1990)Forced-choice: Are forensic interviewers asking the right questions? (2001)Selecting accurate statements from the cognitive interview using confidence ratings. (2002)Workers’ Compensation and Its Potential for Perpetuation of Disability (2012)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)A Theory of Psychological Reactance (1968)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)The Social psychology of intergroup relations (1979)Procedural goods in a democracy: How one is treated versus what one gets (1988)REACTANCE AND INTENTIONALITY ATTRIBUTIONS AS DETERMINANTS OF THE INTENT TO FILE A GRIEVANCE (1989)The truth-justice tradeoff: Perceptions of decisional accuracy and procedural justice in adversarial and inquisitorial legal systems. (2014)Doing Justice--The Choice of Punishments (1976)Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship (1984)Strategic Judging Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines: Positive Political Theory and Evidence (2006)FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin (2009)Criminal Recidivism after Prison and Electronic Monitoring (2013)Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts (2001)Do Judges Vary in Their Treatment of Race? (2012)Racial Disparity in Federal Criminal Sentences (2014)An Empirical Study of Political Bias in Legal Scholarship (2015)Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions (2019)Restorative for All? Racial Disproportionality and School Discipline Under Restorative Justice (2021)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook (1999)Social Research Methods (2013)Probation officers’ discretionary decisions in responding to probation violations: The case of Lithuania (2020)Features of similarity. (1977)Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. (1983)Handbook of Social Psychology (2013)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. (1999)The Role of Accuracy in Algorithmic Process Fairness Across Multiple Domains (2021)When Algorithms Err : Differential Impact of Early vs. Late Errors on Users’ Reliance on Algorithms (2022)The Quarterly Journal of Economics (2024)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Human Error (1990)Expert political judgment: how good is it? how can we know? (2006)Groups of experts often differ in their decisions: What are the implications for AI and machine learning? A commentary onNoise: A Flaw in Human Judgment, byKahneman, Sibony, and Sunstein (2021) (2023)Assessing judges' use and awareness of cognitive heuristic decision-making (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1999Measuring Interjudge Sentencing Disparity: Before and After the Federal Sentencing Guidelines167 cited
  • 2015Free at Last? Judicial Discretion and Racial Disparities in Federal Sentencing158 cited
  • 2003Handbook of psychology in legal contexts72 cited
  • 2018Trust in Public Policy Algorithms48 cited
  • 1984Legal Justice and the Psychology of Conflict Resolution21 cited
  • 2015Using vignette methodology to research the process of breach comparatively11 cited
  • 2022To differ is human: A reflective commentary on “Noise. A Flaw in Human Judgment”, by D. Kahneman, O. Sibony & C.R. Sunstein (2021). London: William Collins7 cited
  • 2004Contrastive analysis of verdicts, cognitive activity, reasoning and information-processing in judicial judgements2 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work