SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Social Discourse and Environmental Policy : An Application of Q Methodology
2 references·16 citing·48 second hop
Social Discourse and Environmental Policy : An Application of Q Methodology (2001)Social Discourse and Environmental Policy…What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public (2001)What Is a Good Public Partici…Understanding participant perspectives: Q-methodology in national forest management (1999)Understanding participant per…Environmental attitude, motivations and values for marine biodiversity protection (2017)Environmental attitude, motiv…Identifying policy frames through semantic network analysis: an examination of nuclear energy policy across six countries (2015)Identifying policy frames thr…Stakeholders' perceptions of marine fish farming in Catalonia (Spain): A Q-methodology approach (2014)Stakeholders' perceptions of …Applying Q-methodology to select and define attributes for non-market valuation: A case study from Northwest Wyoming, United States (2014)Applying Q-methodology to sel…Shifting environmental perspectives in agriculture: Repeated Q analysis and the stability of preference structures (2012)Shifting environmental perspe…Northern Visions? Applying Q methodology to understand stakeholder views on the environmental and resource dimensions of sustainability (2012)Northern Visions? Applying Q …Diagnostic reframing of intractable environmental problems: Case of a contested multiparty public land-use conflict (2012)Diagnostic reframing of intra…Determinants of willingness to pay for coastal zone quality improvement (2012)Determinants of willingness t…Q Method and Surveys: Three Ways to Combine Q and R (2009)Q Method and Surveys: Three W…Comparing two image research instruments: The Q-sort method versus the Likert attitude questionnaire (2008)Comparing two image research …Using Q methodology to develop more perceptive insights on transport and social inclusion (2007)Using Q methodology to develo…The Environmental Values of Potential Ecotourists: A Segmentation Study (2007)The Environmental Values of P…Q Methodology and Rural Research (2007)Q Methodology and Rural Resea…A Match Made in Heaven: A Marginalized Methodology for Studying the Marginalized (2006)A Match Made in Heaven: A Mar…Post-normal science in practice: A Q study of the potential for sustainable forestry in Washington State, USA (2005)Post-normal science in practi…Visitors' and locals' experiences of Rotorua, New Zealand: an interpretative study using photographs of landscapes and Q method (2002)Visitors' and locals' experie…An Index of Factorial Simplicity (1974)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)Research methods for business: A skill building approach (1993)Text vs. logo: Does eco-label format influence consumers’ visual attention and willingness-to-pay for fruit plants? An experimental auction approach (2019)What if consumers saw the bigger picture? Systems thinking and the adoption of bio-based consumer products (2021)Environmental values and sustainable consumption (2024)An Economic Theory of Democracy. (1958)Communication Yearbook 3 (1981)Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science (1982)Public views on principles for health care priority setting: Findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology (2014)Principal’s perceptions of effective professional development in schools (2016)Q methodology in applied linguistics: A systematic research synthesis (2023)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)The Politics of Environmental Discourse (1997)The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (1997)Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability (2006)How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy (2008)Inclusive risk governance: concepts and application to environmental policy making (2009)‘Complacent Car Addicts’ or ‘Aspiring Environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory (2005)Doing Q ethodology: theory, method and interpretation (2005)Q-methodology and tourism research (2010)A discursive framework of B2B brand legitimacy (2021)Stakeholder perceptions of uncertainty matter in megaprojects: The Flemish A102 infrastructure project (2023)Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality (1986)The Measurement of Destination Image: An Empirical Assessment (1993)The tourist gaze (2002)Doing Feminist Research. (1982)Q methodology in social work research (2009)Construction Workers’ Well-Being: What Leads to Depression, Anxiety, and Stress? (2017)Analytical hierarchy process (1994)Consumer Behaviour: A European Perspective (1999)Consumer Behaviour: A European Perspective (1999)THE ENVIRONMENT-TOURISM NEXUS (2009)Young Tourists and Sustainability. Profiles, Attitudes, and Implications for Destination Strategies (2015)Who is consuming the countryside? An activity-based segmentation analysis of the domestic rural tourism market in Portugal (2017)A technique for measurement of attitudes (1932)Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975)Summated Rating Scale Construction (1992)Sorting out the essence of owner–contractor collaboration in capital project delivery (2014)Examining Perceptions and Attitudes (2016)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2007)Q Methodology in Audience Research: Bridging the Qualitative/Quantitative 'Divide'? (2011)Overly ambitious: contributions and current status of Q methodology (2013)The United States Department of Agriculture (1912)A Ladder Of Citizen Participation (1969)Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. (1994)Structuring subjectivities? Using Q methodology in human geography (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public550 cited
  • 1999Understanding participant perspectives: Q-methodology in national forest management268 cited

Cited by

  • 2007Q Methodology and Rural Research149 cited
  • 2007The Environmental Values of Potential Ecotourists: A Segmentation Study141 cited
  • 2008Comparing two image research instruments: The Q-sort method versus the Likert attitude questionnaire138 cited
  • 2009Q Method and Surveys: Three Ways to Combine Q and R122 cited
  • 2002Visitors' and locals' experiences of Rotorua, New Zealand: an interpretative study using photographs of landscapes and Q method122 cited
  • 2006A Match Made in Heaven: A Marginalized Methodology for Studying the Marginalized101 cited
  • 2007Using Q methodology to develop more perceptive insights on transport and social inclusion99 cited
  • 2017Environmental attitude, motivations and values for marine biodiversity protection97 cited
  • 2005Post-normal science in practice: A Q study of the potential for sustainable forestry in Washington State, USA95 cited
  • 2014Applying Q-methodology to select and define attributes for non-market valuation: A case study from Northwest Wyoming, United States87 cited
  • 2014Stakeholders' perceptions of marine fish farming in Catalonia (Spain): A Q-methodology approach83 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2012Northern Visions? Applying Q methodology to understand stakeholder views on the environmental and resource dimensions of sustainability82 cited
  • 2012Determinants of willingness to pay for coastal zone quality improvement80 cited
  • 2015Identifying policy frames through semantic network analysis: an examination of nuclear energy policy across six countries73 cited
  • 2012Diagnostic reframing of intractable environmental problems: Case of a contested multiparty public land-use conflict71 cited
  • 2012Shifting environmental perspectives in agriculture: Repeated Q analysis and the stability of preference structures70 cited