In the Jury Box: Controversies in the Courtroom

Abstract

PART ONE: JURY SELECTION Recipe for a Jury - Jay Schulman et al Social Scientists Can't Rig Juries - Michael J Saks Juror Selection - Irvin A Horowitz A Comparison of Two Methods in Several Criminal Cases PART TWO: THE BIASED JUROR Authoritarianism and Decisions of Mock Juries - Robert R Bray and Audrey M Noble Evidence of Jury Bias and Group Polarization Role Departures and Making Law - Martha A Myers Juries and Their Verdicts Reducing the Effects of Juror Bias - Martin E Kaplan and Lynn E Miller PART THREE: JURY COMPETENCE On the Requirements of Proof - Saul M Kassin and Lawrence S Wrightsman The Timing of Judicial Instruction and Mock Juror Verdicts Toward Understandable Jury Instruction - A Elwork, James J Alfini and Bruce B Sales Helping Juries Handle Complex Cases - David U Strawn and G Thomas Munsterman PART FOUR: JURY SIZE AND DECISION RULE Convincing Empirical Evidence on the Jury - Hans Zeisel and Shari S Diamond The Effects of Jury Size and Polling Method on the Process and Product of Jury Deliberation - Norbert L Kerr and Robert J MacCoun Interactions Between Jurors as a Function of Majority vs Unanimity Decision Rules - Charlan Nemeth

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 38 citations exist upstream.