The U.S. Court of Appeals and the law of confessions : perspectives on the hierarchy of justice

Sara C. Benesh

35 citations0/0 files storedThammasat University Digital Collections

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Judicial and Constitutional Studies Legal processes and jurisprudence Criminal Law and Evidence

Abstract

The hierarchy of justice -- A model of the relationship between the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court -- Confession cases in American courts -- Decision making in the United States Courts of Appeals -- When the Supreme Court speaks : an analysis of lower court treatment of Supreme Court decisions -- From judge to justice : institutional effects on judicial decision-making processes -- Conclusions : faithful agents, ideological actors.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2011Rethinking the Judicial Settlement of Reconstruction 2007Splitting the Difference: Modeling Appellate Court Decisions with Mixed Outcomes 2013Is Certiorari Contingent on Litigant Behavior? Petitioners' Role in Strategic Auditing 2016Sound the Alarm? Judicial Decisions Regarding Publication and Dissent 2011The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the U.S. Courts of Appeals 2006Amici Curiae in the U.S. Courts of Appeals 2008The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the United States Courts of Appeals 2013Bargaining and Legal Development in the United States Courts of Appeals

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.