SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The U.S. Court of Appeals and the law of confessions : perspectives on the hierarchy of justice
0 references·12 citing·43 second hop
The U.S. Court of Appeals and the law of confessions : perspectives on the hierarchy of justice (2002)The U.S. Court of Appeals and the law of …United Kingdom, United Courts? Hierarchical Interactions and Attention to Precedent in the British Judiciary (2019)United Kingdom, United Courts…The Aggregate Dynamics of Lower Court Responses to the US Supreme Court (2019)The Aggregate Dynamics of Low…Sound the Alarm? Judicial Decisions Regarding Publication and Dissent (2016)Sound the Alarm? Judicial Dec…The Information Dynamics of Vertical Stare Decisis (2013)The Information Dynamics of V…Is Certiorari Contingent on Litigant Behavior? Petitioners' Role in Strategic Auditing (2013)Is Certiorari Contingent on L…Bargaining and Legal Development in the United States Courts of Appeals (2013)Bargaining and Legal Developm…The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the U.S. Courts of Appeals (2011)The Small Group Context: Desi…Rethinking the Judicial Settlement of Reconstruction (2011)Rethinking the Judicial Settl…On the Relationship between Public Opinion and Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals (2010)On the Relationship between P…The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the United States Courts of Appeals (2008)The Small Group Context: Desi…Splitting the Difference: Modeling Appellate Court Decisions with Mixed Outcomes (2007)Splitting the Difference: Mod…Amici Curiae in the U.S. Courts of Appeals (2006)Amici Curiae in the U.S. Cour…The Common Place of Law (1998)Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics (2000)The Wages of Whiteness (2017)The American Voter. By A. Campbell, P. Converse, W. Miller, and D. Stokes. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1960. Pp. viii, 573. $8.50.) (1960)Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes" (1999)Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses (2005)Judges and Friends (2014)Strategy and the Decision to Dissent on the U.S. Courts of Appeals (2014)Lucky you: Your case is heard by a seasoned panel—Panel effects in the German Constitutional Court (2022)North Carolina Law Review (1927)The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model (1993)The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (2002)Counteractive Lobbying in the U.S. Supreme Court (2009)Lobbying Justice(s)? Exploring the Nature of Amici Influence in State Supreme Court Decision Making (2017)The Influence of Unique Information in Briefs on Supreme Court Opinion Content (2019)Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change (1974)The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? (1992)Why People Obey the Law (2006)Examining the efficiency of the U.S. courts of appeals: Pathologies and prescriptions (2011)Prosecuting from the bench? Examining sources of pro‐prosecution bias in judges (2022)The demand for deductibles in private health insurance (1981)Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms (1984)Judicial Ideology and the Selection of Disputes for U.S. Supreme Court Adjudication (2013)Assessing the Anecdotes: Amicus Curiae, Legal Rules, and the U.S. Supreme Court (2015)The “Odd Party Out” Theory of Certiorari (2024)Statehouse democracy: public opinion and policy in the American states (1995)Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93 (1998)Public Mood, Previous Electoral Experience, and Responsiveness Among Federal Circuit Court Judges (2017)Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (2021)The Selection of Disputes for Litigation (1984)Deferring, Deliberating, or Dodging Review (2020)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Crafting law on the Supreme Court: the collegial game (2001)Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging (2010)The Neuroscience behind Cognitive Aging (2024)Political Control Versus Expertise: Congressional Choices about Administrative Procedures (1995)The choices justices make (1997)The Complexities of State Court Compliance with U.S. Supreme Court Precedent (2017)Strategic Opinion Language on the US Courts of Appeals (2020)Rigid rules and slippery standards: How the nature of U.S. Supreme Court precedents influences subsequent state court treatments (2021)10 Judges, Expertise, and Analogy (2010)2 Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging (2010)3 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2011Rethinking the Judicial Settlement of Reconstruction57 cited
  • 2013Is Certiorari Contingent on Litigant Behavior? Petitioners' Role in Strategic Auditing31 cited
  • 2007Splitting the Difference: Modeling Appellate Court Decisions with Mixed Outcomes31 cited
  • 2016Sound the Alarm? Judicial Decisions Regarding Publication and Dissent27 cited
  • 2011The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the U.S. Courts of Appeals26 cited
  • 2006Amici Curiae in the U.S. Courts of Appeals24 cited
  • 2013Bargaining and Legal Development in the United States Courts of Appeals23 cited
  • 2008The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the United States Courts of Appeals23 cited
  • 2013The Information Dynamics of Vertical Stare Decisis22 cited
  • 2010On the Relationship between Public Opinion and Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals18 cited
  • 2019United Kingdom, United Courts? Hierarchical Interactions and Attention to Precedent in the British Judiciary15 cited
  • 2019The Aggregate Dynamics of Lower Court Responses to the US Supreme Court11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work