Chapter2013

Shakespeare after Theory

98 citations0/0 files storedRoutledge eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism Renaissance Literature and Culture Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics

Abstract

The most familiar assertion of Shakespeare scholarship is that he is our contemporary. Shakespeare After Theory provocatively argues that he is not, but what value he has for us must at least begin with a recognition of his distance from us.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 98 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2010Close but not Deep: Literary Ethics and the Descriptive Turn 2004:Shakespeare and the Force of Modern Performance 2006Ideas of the Book and Histories of Literature: After Theory?2003Virgilian Models of Colonization in Shakespeare's Tempest 2009Making Shakespeare’s Books: Assembly and Intertextuality in the Archives 2004"Unkind Division": The Double Absence of Performing History in 1 Henry VI 2002Scaffolds of Treason in Macbeth 2010Shakespeare's Richard II, "Popularity," and the Early Modern Public Sphere

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.