SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Never Pure: Historical Studies of Science as if It Was Produced by People with Bodies, Situated in Time, Space, Culture, and Society, and Struggling for Credibility and Authority
4 references·16 citing·48 second hop
Never Pure: Historical Studies of Science as if It Was Produced by People with Bodies, Situated in Time, Space, Culture, and Society, and Struggling for Credibility and Authority (2015)Never Pure: Historical Studies of Science…Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (1987)Leviathan and the Air-Pump: H…Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. (1970)Natural Symbols: Explorations…Natural symbols; explorations in cosmology (1970)Natural symbols; explorations…The Origins of Modern Science: 1300-1800 (1950)The Origins of Modern Science…Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on? (2021)Strengthening research integr…How Professionals Construct Moral Authority: Expanding Boundaries of Expert Authority in Stem Cell Science (2021)How Professionals Construct M…Tackling COVID-19 through Responsible AI Innovation: Five Steps in the Right Direction (2020)Tackling COVID-19 through Res…The impact of tourism research (2019)The impact of tourism researchThe History of Knowledge and the Future of Knowledge Societies (2019)The History of Knowledge and …Reconciliation between factions focused on near-term and long-term artificial intelligence (2017)Reconciliation between factio…How to Share “A Really Good Secret”: Managing Sharing/Secrecy Tensions Around Scientific Knowledge Disclosure (2016)How to Share “A Really Good S…The Political Context of Science in the United States: Public Acceptance of Evidence-Based Policy and Science Funding (2015)The Political Context of Scie…Inevitability, contingency, and epistemic humility (2015)Inevitability, contingency, a…Describing “Science Practice” in Learning Settings (2015)Describing “Science Practice”…What is Basic Research? Insights from Historical Semantics (2014)What is Basic Research? Insig…Institutions for Civic Technoscience: How Critical Making is Transforming Environmental Research (2014)Institutions for Civic Techno…From the ivory tower to the startup garage: Organizational context and commercialization processes (2014)From the ivory tower to the s…Unrolling Egyptian mummies in nineteenth-century Britain (2013)Unrolling Egyptian mummies in…Ethics in the Production and Dissemination of Management Research: Institutional Failure or Individual Fallibility? (2013)Ethics in the Production and …Scientific Communication and the Nature of Science (2012)Scientific Communication and …Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective (1988)Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective (1988)Epistemic Cultures (1999)Ensino de Ciências por Investigação e o Desenvolvimento de Práticas: Uma Mirada para a Base Nacional Comum Curricular (2018)From Data Collectors to Data Producers: Shifting Students’ Relationship to Data (2019)From Inquiry-Based Science Education to the Approach Based on Scientific Practices (2020)Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (1988)5. The Practice of Everyday Life (2000)The Location of Culture (2012)Politics, ecology, and the new anthropology of energy: exploring the emerging frontiers of hydraulic fracking (2014)The Theory and Practice of Citizen Science: Launching a New Journal (2016)Participatory design of citizen science experiments (2017)We have never been modern (1994)Reassembling the Social (2005)Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor‐network‐theory (2008)Academic entrepreneurship and institutional change in historical perspective (2017)Excellence and Frontier Research as Travelling Concepts in Science Policymaking (2018)The social contract for science and the value-free ideal (2024)Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. (1975)Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity (1994)Climate and environmental science denial: A review of the scientific literature published in 1990–2015 (2017)Love the Science, Hate the Scientists: Conservative Identity Protects Belief in Science and Undermines Trust in Scientists (2019)Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (2020)Republicans, Not Democrats, Are More Likely to Endorse Anti-Vaccine Misinformation (2021)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (1980)Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations (1991)Solutions to the Credibility Crisis in Management Science (2016)Confronting the Crisis of Confidence in Management Studies: Why Senior Scholars Need to Stop Setting a Bad Example (2018)Pathogenic organization in science: Division of labor and retractions (2018)Chapter 12: What does the Anthropocene hold for citizenship? (1905)The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. (1971)We Have Never Been Modern (1994)Rethinking AI for Good Governance (2022)A critical review towards artificial general intelligence: Challenges, ethical considerations, and the path forward (2024)Unmasking inequalities of the code: Disentangling the nexus of AI and inequality (2024)An Engine, Not a Camera (2006)Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values (2006)Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context (2011)Cultural Cognition of the Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology (2009)The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model (2014)Inclusion and Democracy (2019)How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies (2004)INDIGENOUS COSMOPOLITICS IN THE ANDES: Conceptual Reflections beyond “Politics” (2010)Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things (2010)The art of scientific investigation (1957)Whither Services Marketing? (2004)A History of Universalism: Conceptions of the Internationality of Science from the Enlightenment to the Cold War (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1987Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life2,150 cited
  • 1970Natural symbols; explorations in cosmology1,093 cited
  • 1970Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology.525 cited
  • 1950The Origins of Modern Science: 1300-1800205 cited

Cited by

  • 2015The Political Context of Science in the United States: Public Acceptance of Evidence-Based Policy and Science Funding190 cited
  • 2014Institutions for Civic Technoscience: How Critical Making is Transforming Environmental Research126 cited
  • 2015Describing “Science Practice” in Learning Settings95 cited
  • 2020Tackling COVID-19 through Responsible AI Innovation: Five Steps in the Right Direction94 cited
  • 2014What is Basic Research? Insights from Historical Semantics77 cited
  • 2013Ethics in the Production and Dissemination of Management Research: Institutional Failure or Individual Fallibility?74 cited
  • 2012Scientific Communication and the Nature of Science74 cited
  • 2016How to Share “A Really Good Secret”: Managing Sharing/Secrecy Tensions Around Scientific Knowledge Disclosure64 cited
  • 2014From the ivory tower to the startup garage: Organizational context and commercialization processes62 cited
  • 2013Unrolling Egyptian mummies in nineteenth-century Britain

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

57 cited
  • 2019The History of Knowledge and the Future of Knowledge Societies56 cited
  • 2015Inevitability, contingency, and epistemic humility55 cited
  • 2019The impact of tourism research53 cited
  • 2021Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on?48 cited
  • 2017Reconciliation between factions focused on near-term and long-term artificial intelligence43 cited
  • 2021How Professionals Construct Moral Authority: Expanding Boundaries of Expert Authority in Stem Cell Science43 cited