SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Spin kills science
6 references·3 citing·34 second hop
Spin kills science (2015)Spin kills scienceSystematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…"Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study (2013)"Hardly worth the effort"? Me…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…"Spin" in scientific writing: scientific mischief and legal jeopardy. (2007)"Spin" in scientific writing:…Research Ethics: Ethical Issues of Data Reporting and the Quest for Authenticity (2000)Research Ethics: Ethical Issu…Spin in traumatic brain injury literature: prevalence and associated factors. A systematic review (2024)Spin in traumatic brain injur…Do infographics ‘spin’ the findings of health and medical research? (2024)Do infographics ‘spin’ the fi…Effect of spin in the abstract of a randomised controlled trial on physiotherapists’ perception of treatment benefit: a randomised controlled trial (2021)Effect of spin in the abstrac…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical Research (1987)How to report statistics in medicine: annotated guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers (1997)Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries (1999)Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians (2018)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2002)Analyzing Qualitative Data (2007)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2010)Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013 (2015)Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)Over-interpretation of findings in diagnostic accuracy studies of infectious diseases (2023)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Development of the Reporting Infographics and Visual Abstracts of Comparative studies (RIVA-C) checklist and guide (2024)Overinterpretation and Misreporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Evidence of “Spin” (2013)A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity (2016)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,136 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes833 cited
  • 2013"Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study139 cited
  • 2007"Spin" in scientific writing: scientific mischief and legal jeopardy.82 cited
  • 2000Research Ethics: Ethical Issues of Data Reporting and the Quest for Authenticity58 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Effect of spin in the abstract of a randomised controlled trial on physiotherapists’ perception of treatment benefit: a randomised controlled trial9 cited
  • 2024Spin in traumatic brain injury literature: prevalence and associated factors. A systematic review8 cited
  • 2024Do infographics ‘spin’ the findings of health and medical research?6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work