Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How library and information science faculty perceive and engage with open access

6 references·16 citing·50 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2004Scholarly communication in the digital environment: what do authors want?146 cited
2007Factors influencing publication choice: why faculty choose open access122 cited
2010A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors toward open‐access journal publishing101 cited
2005Open access journal publishing: the views of some of the world's senior authors62 cited
2010Open Access to Research Outputs—Institutional Policies and Researchers' Views: Results From Two Complementary Surveys57 cited
2007The Influence of Academic Values on Scholarly Publication and Communication Practices.53 cited

Cited by

2022Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries62 cited
2017Motivating participation in open science by examining researcher incentives52 cited
2018Attitudes toward Open Access, Open Peer Review, and Altmetrics among Contributors to Spanish Scholarly Journals41 cited
2023Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers39 cited
2020The Open-Access Availability of Criminological Research to Practitioners and Policy Makers36 cited
2018Scholarly Communication Practices in Humanities and Social Sciences: A Study of Researchers’ Attitudes and Awareness of Open Access35 cited
2021Toward Open Research: A Narrative Review of the Challenges and Opportunities for Open Humanities

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

31 cited

2018Exploring the interdisciplinary characteristics of library and information science (LIS) from the perspective of interdisciplinary LIS authors28 cited

2017Perceptions, preferences of scholarly publishing in Open Access journals27 cited

2017Citations, mandates, and money: Author motivations to publish in chemistry hybrid open access journals27 cited

2016An examination of North American Library and Information Studies faculty perceptions of and experience with open-access scholarly publishing26 cited

2017Scholarly Metrics Baseline: A Survey of Faculty Knowledge, Use, and Opinion about Scholarly Metrics24 cited

2017Comparative study of characteristics of authors between open access and non-open access journals in library and information science22 cited

2017Perceptions, preferences of scholarly publishing in open access routes20 cited

2018Open Access: Current Overview and Future Prospects19 cited

2023Open access movement in the scholarly world: Pathways for libraries in developing countries18 cited