SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Psychology of the Supreme Court
0 references·16 citing·40 second hop
The Psychology of the Supreme Court (2006)The Psychology of the Supreme CourtThe Maintenance of Institutional Legitimacy in Supreme Court Justices’ Public Rhetoric (2019)The Maintenance of Institutio…Supreme Court Justices’ Loyalty to the President (2016)Supreme Court Justices’ Loyal…Silent Acquiescence on the Supreme Court (2014)Silent Acquiescence on the Su…Judges and Friends (2014)Judges and FriendsThe Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the U.S. Courts of Appeals (2011)The Small Group Context: Desi…9 In Praise of Pedantic Eclecticism: Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Psychology of Judging (2010)9 In Praise of Pedantic Eclec…7 Is There a Psychology of Judging? (2010)7 Is There a Psychology of Ju…5 Judges as Members of Small Groups (2010)5 Judges as Members of Small …3 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning (2010)3 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mode…2 Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging (2010)2 Multiple Constraint Satisfa…10 Judges, Expertise, and Analogy (2010)10 Judges, Expertise, and Ana…1 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry (2010)1 Motivation and Judicial Beh…God in the Courtroom (2009)God in the CourtroomCognitive Dissonance on the U.S. Supreme Court (2009)Cognitive Dissonance on the U…The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the United States Courts of Appeals (2008)The Small Group Context: Desi…Amici Curiae and Dissensus on the U.S. Supreme Court (2008)Amici Curiae and Dissensus on…The American Voter. By A. Campbell, P. Converse, W. Miller, and D. Stokes. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1960. Pp. viii, 573. $8.50.) (1960)Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes" (1999)Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses (2005)Strategy and the Decision to Dissent on the U.S. Courts of Appeals (2014)Lucky you: Your case is heard by a seasoned panel—Panel effects in the German Constitutional Court (2022)The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America (1960)Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics (1970)Designing Social Inquiry (1994)Measuring Case Salience in State Courts of Last Resort (2010)The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court: Executive Branch Influence and Judicial Decisions (2012)The Influence of Public Sentiment on Supreme Court Opinion Clarity (2016)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)Courts and Politics in Southeast Asia (2024)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)The Role of Case Complexity in Judicial Decision Making (2012)Judges, ‘common sense’ and judicial cognition (2016)The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. (1956)Arbitrator Decision-Making: Unconscious Psychological Influences and What You Can Do About Them (2014)Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance (1999)The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (2002)Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation (2005)An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Supreme Court Justices’ Public Rhetoric on Perceptions of Judicial Legitimacy (2020)TRENDS: The Supreme Court’s (Surprising?) Indifference to Public Opinion (2020)Motivated Reasoning and Attitudes Towards Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings: Evidence from Five Nominations and an Experiment (2022)North Carolina Law Review (1927)Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors (2008)New York University Law Review (2017)Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions (2019)Human Capital in Court: The Role of Attorney Experience in US Supreme Court Litigation (2021)The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Behavior (2021)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (1988)Religious Fundamentalism and Psychological Well-Being: An Italian Study (2015)Capital-izing Jurors: How Death Qualification Relates to Jury Composition, Jurors’ Perceptions, and Trial Outcomes (2016)Religious fundamentalism, religiosity, and priming: effects on attitudes, perceptions, and mock jurors’ decisions in an insanity defense case (2016)Considering the consequences of increased reliance on judicial assistants: a study on Dutch courts (2014)Evaluating the Effect of Law Clerk Gender on Voting at the United States Supreme Court (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2008Amici Curiae and Dissensus on the U.S. Supreme Court63 cited
  • 2016Supreme Court Justices’ Loyalty to the President50 cited
  • 20105 Judges as Members of Small Groups36 cited
  • 20107 Is There a Psychology of Judging?36 cited
  • 20101 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry29 cited
  • 2009God in the Courtroom28 cited
  • 2011The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the U.S. Courts of Appeals26 cited
  • 2019The Maintenance of Institutional Legitimacy in Supreme Court Justices’ Public Rhetoric24 cited
  • 2008The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the United States Courts of Appeals23 cited
  • 20103 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning22 cited
  • 2014Silent Acquiescence on the Supreme Court18 cited
  • 2009Cognitive Dissonance on the U.S. Supreme Court18 cited
  • 20102 Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging17 cited
  • 201010 Judges, Expertise, and Analogy16 cited
  • 2014Judges and Friends15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2010
9 In Praise of Pedantic Eclecticism: Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Psychology of Judging
11 cited