Plagiarism and Literary Property in the Romantic Period

Tilar J. Mazzeo

85 citations0/0 files storedUniversity of Pennsylvania Press eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Historical and Literary Analyses Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books Poetry Analysis and Criticism

Abstract

Were the Romantic poets plagiarists, and did plagiarism have the same meaning two hundred years ago as it has today? Tilar J. Mazzeo offers a major reassessment of the role of borrowing, textual appropriation, and narrative mastery in British Romantic literature and provides a new picture of the period and its central aesthetic contests.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 85 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2012Identity in Place: Lord Byron, John Clare and Lyric Poetry 2010Creating a Paradox: Quobna Ottobah Cugoano and the Slave Trade's Violation of the Principles of Christianity, Reason, and Property Ownership 2015A New Perspective on the Minerva Press's “Derivative” Novels: Authorizing Borrowed Material 2009Charlotte Smith's Literary Exile 2013Reframing Poetry: The Romantic Essay and the Prospects of Verse 2019Plagiarizing the Victorian Novel 2019Modes of Authorship and the Making of Medieval English Literature 2010The Significance of Copyright History for Publishing History and Historians

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.