Empowerment evaluation : knowledge and tools for self-assessment & accountability

Abstract

PART ONE: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Empowerment Evaluation - David M Fetterman An Introduction to Theory and Practice PART TWO: BREADTH AND SCOPE Empowerment Evaluation and Accelerated Schools - Henry M Levin Empowerment Evaluation and the W K Kellogg Foundation - Ricardo A Millett PART THREE: CONTEXT Empowerment Evaluation and State Government - Joyce Keller Moving from Resistance to Adoption The HIV Prevention Evaluation Initiative - Cynthia Gomez and Ellen Goldstein A Model for Collaborative and Empowerment Evaluation Empowerment Evaluation - Cheryl Grills et al Building upon a Tradition of Activism in the African American Community Realizing Participant Empowerment in the Evaluation of Nonprofit Women's Services Organizations - Arlene B Andrews Notes from the Front Line PART FOUR: THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL FRAMEWORKS Empowering Community Health Initiatives through Evaluation - Stephen B Fawcett et al Empowerment Evaluation at Federal and Local Levels - Robert K Yin, Shakeh J Kaftarian, and Nancy F Jacobs Dealing with Quality Evaluation and Self-Direction in Community Prevention Coalitions - John F Stevenson, Roger E Mitchell, and Paul Florin Fairness, Liberty, and Empowerment Evaluation - Dennis E Mithaug PART FIVE: WORKSHOPS, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, AND PRACTICE Empowering Community Groups with Evaluation Skills - Jean Ann Linney and Abraham Wandersman The Prevention Plus III Model Participatory and Empowerment Evaluation - Margret A Dugan Lessons Learned in Training and Technical Assistance The Plan Quality Index - Frances D Butterfoss et al An Empowerment Evaluation Tool for Measuring and Improving the Quality of Plans Building Community Capacity with Evaluation Activities That Empower - Steven W Mayer PART SIX: CONCLUSION Conclusion - David M Fetterman Reflections on Emergent Themes and the Next Steps

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 551 citations exist upstream.