SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Creative Industries: A Bibliometric Review and Research Agenda
15 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Creative Industries: A Bibliometric Review and Research Agenda (2026)Generative Artificial Intelligence and th…The EU's AI act: A framework for collaborative governance (2024)The EU's AI act: A framework …On the creativity of large language models (2024)On the creativity of large la…Not “what”, but “where is creativity?”: towards a relational-materialist approach to generative AI (2024)Not “what”, but “where is cre…Navigating the Ethical Terrain of AI-Generated Text Tools: A Review (2024)Navigating the Ethical Terrai…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)How to conduct a bibliometric…On Using Grey Literature and Google Scholar in Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering (2020)On Using Grey Literature and …GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences (2020)GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Lim…Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Literature review as a resear…Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017)Evaluative infrastructures: A…bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)bibliometrix : An R-tool for …On being ‘Systematic’ in Literature Reviews in IS (2014)On being ‘Systematic’ in Lite…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Towards a Methodology for Dev…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding (2016)Why do people play games? A meta-analysis (2017)Data governance: A conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda (2019)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (2003)The Nature of the Firm (1937)The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism (1970)The Strength of Weak Ties (1973)What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy (2020)Digitalization, accounting and accountability: A literature review and reflections on future research in public services (2021)The Invisible Cage: Workers’ Reactivity to Opaque Algorithmic Evaluations (2021)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? (2020)Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR) (2021)I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE (1950)Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation (1976)Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) (2004)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research (2022)Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice (2022)Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2017bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis16,195 cited
  • 2003Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review15,354 cited
  • 2021How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines14,255 cited
  • 2019Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines11,435 cited
  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 2020GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences2,513 cited
  • 2014On being ‘Systematic’ in Literature Reviews in IS489 cited
  • 2017Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization349 cited
  • 2024The EU's AI act: A framework for collaborative governance129 cited
  • 2024On the creativity of large language models112 cited
  • 2020On Using Grey Literature and Google Scholar in Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering85 cited
  • 2024Not “what”, but “where is creativity?”: towards a relational-materialist approach to generative AI50 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2024Navigating the Ethical Terrain of AI-Generated Text Tools: A Review35 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.