SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Autonomous artificial intelligence, scientific research, and human values
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Autonomous artificial intelligence, scientific research, and human values (2026)Autonomous artificial intelligence, scien…AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking (2025)AI Tools in Society: Impacts …A Manager and an AI Walk into a Bar: Does ChatGPT Make Biased Decisions Like We Do? (2025)A Manager and an AI Walk into…The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)The ethics of using artificia…Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Review (2024)Mapping the Ethics of Generat…Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Fighting reviewer fatigue or …AI can only produce artificial creativity (2023)AI can only produce artificia…Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Responsible Conduct of Resear…Accountability in Artificial Intelligence: What It Is and How It Works (2022)Accountability in Artificial …Meta-assessment of bias in science (2017)Meta-assessment of bias in sc…A Tapestry of Values (2017)A Tapestry of ValuesProblems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)Problems with Traditional Sci…Creating Capabilities (2013)Creating CapabilitiesHow Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…The Price of Truth (2007)The Price of TruthReal Science (2000)Real ScienceTrustworthiness (1996)TrustworthinessThe Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)The earth is flat ( p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research (2017)What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research. (2018)Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis (2019)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. (1975)ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (2004)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies (2011)Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task (1999)Ethical Implications and Accountability of Algorithms (2018)Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI (2020)Managing the race to the moon: Global policy and governance in Artificial Intelligence regulation—A contemporary overview and an analysis of socioeconomic consequences (2024)The Era of Artificial Intelligence Deception: Unraveling the Complexities of False Realities and Emerging Threats of Misinformation (2024)Transparency and accountability in AI systems: safeguarding wellbeing in the age of algorithmic decision-making (2024)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions (2023)The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts (2023)Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning (1988)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics (2014)AI Anxiety: a comprehensive analysis of psychological factors and interventions (2025)Cognitive offloading or cognitive overload? How AI alters the mental architecture of coping (2025)Students’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Use in Academic Writing in English as a Foreign Language (2025)Democratic Values: A Better Foundation for Public Trust in Science (2019)More than ‘canaries in the gender coal mine’: A transfeminist approach to research on detransition (2020)Sealing the gateways for post-truthism: Reestablishing the epistemic authority of science (2020)What “ideas‐about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community (2003)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Discrimination and Health Inequities (2014)Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior (1998)Critical Citizens (1999)Political Trust and Trustworthiness (2000)Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Barriers to Accessing Health Care Services in Rural Settings: A Human Capabilities Approach (2021)The human functioning revolution: implications for health systems and sciences (2023)Marketing’s role in promoting dignity and human rights: A conceptualization for assessment and future research (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2025AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking1,199 cited
  • 2000Real Science761 cited
  • 2022Accountability in Artificial Intelligence: What It Is and How It Works493 cited
  • 2017Meta-assessment of bias in science364 cited
  • 2017A Tapestry of Values343 cited
  • 1996Trustworthiness330 cited
  • 2023Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review268 cited
  • 2013Creating Capabilities251 cited
  • 2022Responsible Conduct of Research223 cited
  • 2024The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool220 cited
  • 2023AI can only produce artificial creativity188 cited
  • 2007The Price of Truth160 cited
  • 2014Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review158 cited
  • 2025A Manager and an AI Walk into a Bar: Does ChatGPT Make Biased Decisions Like We Do?143 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2024Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Review140 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.