SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Communicating Science in the Age of GenAI: Can Generative AI Support the Usage of Higher-Level Science Communication Strategies in Writing?
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Communicating Science in the Age of GenAI: Can Generative AI Support the Usage of Higher-Level Science Communication Strategies in Writing? (2026)Communicating Science in the Age of GenAI…Is it OK for AI to write science papers? Nature survey shows researchers are split (2025)Is it OK for AI to write scie…Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool (2024)Using artificial intelligence…Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI (2024)Techniques for supercharging …Science communication with generative AI (2024)Science communication with ge…Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback? (2024)Feedback sources in essay wri…Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing (2024)Comparing the quality of huma…Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life (2023)Why and how to embrace AI suc…Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text (2023)Testing of detection tools fo…Changing the Culture of Science Communication Training for Junior Scientists (2018)Changing the Culture of Scien…Science communication training: what are we trying to teach? (2017)Science communication trainin…Communicating Science Effectively (2016)Communicating Science Effecti…Core Skills for Effective Science Communication: A Teaching Resource for Undergraduate Science Education (2015)Core Skills for Effective Sci…Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences (2014)Using narratives and storytel…An Instrument for Assessing Scientists’ Written Skills in Public Communication of Science (2012)An Instrument for Assessing S…Communicating the science of climate change (2011)Communicating the science of …Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition (2003)Science Communication: A Cont…The Concise Oxford Dictionary (1934)New experiences and old knowledge: Towards a model for the personal awareness of science and technology (2002)Towards an Analytical Framework of Science Communication Models (2008)The Matilda Effect in Science Communication (2013)The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? (2016)Actual Minds, Possible Worlds (1986)Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. (1986)The Narrative Construction of Reality (1991)Motivated Rejection of Science (2016)Stories vs. facts: triggering emotion and action-taking on climate change (2019)Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2009)Expert credibility in climate change (2010)Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (2011)Communicating climate change: conduits, content, and consensus (2015)Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’ (2017)A new, valid measure of climate change understanding: associations with risk perception (2018)Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications (1995)How people learn (2000)The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior (2000)Impacts of a comprehensive public engagement training and support program on scientists’ outreach attitudes and practices (2018)Assessment by Audiences Shows Little Effect of Science Communication Training (2020)How should we organize science communication trainings to achieve competencies? (2022)The Science Question in Feminism (1986)The science question in feminism (1987)The Fate of Knowledge (2002)AUTOGEN: A Personalized Large Language Model for Academic Enhancement—Ethics and Proof of Principle (2023)GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing (2025)Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics (2023)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis (2024)Combating misinformation in the age of LLMs: Opportunities and challenges (2024)Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: implications for inclusive education (2024)The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. (1996)Assessment and Classroom Learning (1998)The Power of Feedback (2007)Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom: AI-generated feedback increases secondary students’ text revision, motivation, and positive emotions (2023)Exploring ChatGPT-supported teacher feedback in the EFL context (2024)Comparing the effects of ChatGPT and automated writing evaluation on students’ writing and ideal L2 writing self (2025)Learning to Teach in Higher Education (2003)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)Effects of adaptive feedback generated by a large language model: A case study in teacher education (2024)Generative AI and English essay writing: exploring the role of ChatGPT in enhancing learners’ task engagement (2025)Understanding the place and value of GenAI feedback: a recognition-based framework (2025)Misconceptions, Misinformation, and the Logic of Identity-Protective Cognition (2017)A scientific theory of gist communication and misinformation resistance, with implications for health, education, and policy (2020)Trust and trustworthy artificial intelligence: A research agenda for AI in the environmental sciences (2023)The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills (2024)Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review: Enhancing Efficiency While Preserving Integrity (2025)Artificial intelligence-assisted academic writing: recommendations for ethical use (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences1,162 cited
  • 2003Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition975 cited
  • 2023Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text577 cited
  • 2024Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool574 cited
  • 2024Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing505 cited
  • 2024Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback?282 cited
  • 2023Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life202 cited
  • 2011Communicating the science of climate change191 cited
  • 2016Communicating Science Effectively190 cited
  • 2017Science communication training: what are we trying to teach?151 cited
  • 2015Core Skills for Effective Science Communication: A Teaching Resource for Undergraduate Science Education126 cited
  • 2012An Instrument for Assessing Scientists’ Written Skills in Public Communication of Science109 cited
  • 2025Is it OK for AI to write science papers? Nature survey shows researchers are split100 cited
  • 2024Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI86 cited
  • 2024Science communication with generative AI

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

57 cited
  • 2018Changing the Culture of Science Communication Training for Junior Scientists52 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.