SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The impact of Generation Z on the Workplace: A scoping review
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
The impact of Generation Z on the Workplace: A scoping review (2026)The impact of Generation Z on the Workpla…Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scop…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Scoping reviews: reinforcing …Here comes Generation Z: Millennials as managers (2021)Here comes Generation Z: Mill…DITTO for Gen Z: A framework for leveraging the uniqueness of the new generation (2021)DITTO for Gen Z: A framework …Career aspirations of generation Z: a systematic literature review (2021)Career aspirations of generat…The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)The ABC of systematic literat…Generations and Generational Differences: Debunking Myths in Organizational Science and Practice and Paving New Paths Forward (2020)Generations and Generational …Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Which academic search systems…Chapter 11: Scoping reviews (2019)Chapter 11: Scoping reviewsAre You Ready for Gen Z in the Workplace? (2019)Are You Ready for Gen Z in th…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature (2017)Suitability of Google Scholar…The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The Role of Google Scholar in…Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research (2013)Generational differences in t…Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (2003)Common method biases in behav…Toward a theory of organizational socialization (1977)A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. (1990)How have careers changed? An investigation of changing career patterns across four generations (2015)Leadership : Theory and Practice (2015)What works for you may not work for (Gen)Me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation (2017)Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975)Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects (1986)Structural Equations with Latent Variables. (1991)Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions (2008)Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It (2011)Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM (2015)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review (2019)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Reliability and Validity Assessment (1979)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research (2020)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)A systematic literature review of the role of trust and security on Fintech adoption in banking (2023)Environmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: a scientometric review of global trends (2023)The critiques and criticisms of positive psychology: a systematic review (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice (2022)The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising (2023)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)Digital interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness in older adults: An evidence and gap map (2023)Interaction of empathy and culture: a review (2023)ABC of a Scoping Review: A Simplified JBI Scoping Review Guideline (2024)Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods (2019)Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.81,863 cited
  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2021Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World2,676 cited
  • 2015The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching2,381 cited
  • 2019Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources2,361 cited
  • 2019Chapter 11: Scoping reviews2,217 cited
  • 2021Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application882 cited
  • 2013Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research825 cited
  • 2020The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners655 cited
  • 2019Are You Ready for Gen Z in the Workplace?613 cited
  • 2017Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature486 cited
  • 2021Here comes Generation Z: Millennials as managers386 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2021
Career aspirations of generation Z: a systematic literature review
349 cited
  • 2020Generations and Generational Differences: Debunking Myths in Organizational Science and Practice and Paving New Paths Forward254 cited
  • 2021DITTO for Gen Z: A framework for leveraging the uniqueness of the new generation222 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.