What is the Harm in Fake Luxury Brands? Moving Beyond the Conventional Wisdom

Aaron Ahuvia · Giacomo Gistri · Simona Romani · Stefano Pace

11 citations0/0 files storedGabler Verlag eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification Intellectual Property Law Copyright and Intellectual Property

Abstract

When reading the literature on counterfeit branded luxury goods (henceforth counterfeit BLGs) in both the scientific and popular press, one quickly comes across what we will summarize as the conventional wisdom. We do not mean the phrase “conventional wisdom” to have disparaging connotations. On the contrary, this view is widely popular because it makes sense and fits with common observation.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

References

2011The theory of the leisure class; an economic study of institutions 2010Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence 2025A Glance on Changing Workplace Dynamics Post Covid-19 in India: A Review of Psychological Employee Withdrawal Behavior 2009Why Do Consumers Buy Counterfeit Luxury Brands?2000Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brands?1988Foreign Counterfeiting of Status Goods 2001Spot the difference: consumer responses towards counterfeits 2009Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: a study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.