SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Of mites and men: reference bias in narrative review articles: a systematic review.
0 references·11 citing·45 second hop
Of mites and men: reference bias in narrative review articles: a systematic review. (2005)Of mites and men: reference bias in narra…Citation bias: questionable research practice or scientific misconduct? (2022)Citation bias: questionable r…Systematic reviews in hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapy: considerations and guidance from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research late effects and quality of life working committee (2021)Systematic reviews in hematop…Systematic review and narrative review lead experts to different cancer trial predictions: a randomized trial (2020)Systematic review and narrati…Impact of review method on the conclusions of clinical reviews: A systematic review on dietary interventions in depression as a case in point (2020)Impact of review method on th…Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2015)Research synthesis in veterin…Editorial: Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature (2014)Editorial: Methodology and re…Systematic Reviews for Informing Rehabilitation Practice: An Introduction (2012)Systematic Reviews for Inform…Six concerns about the data in aid debates: applying an epidemiological perspective to the analysis of aid effectiveness in health and development (2012)Six concerns about the data i…Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (2008)Systematic Reviews and Meta-A…Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in coloproctology: interpretation and potential pitfalls (2007)Systematic reviews and meta‐a…Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional study (2007)Are benefits and harms in mam…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)On the benefits of systematic reviews for wildlife parasitology (2016)Using campaigns to improve perceptions of the value of adult vaccination in the United States: Health communication considerations and insights (2017)Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed (2021)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The Role of Neurosurgery Journals in Evidence-Based Neurosurgical Care (2014)Quality of Literature Searches Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Review of Reviews (2020)Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis (1989)Minimizing the Three Stages of Publication Bias (1990)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Abstracts in high profile journals often fail to report harm (2008)Citations of scientific results and conflicts of interest: the case of mammography screening (2013)Conclusions in systematic reviews of mammography for breast cancer screening and associations with review design and author characteristics (2017)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Systematic overview of economic evaluations of health-related rehabilitation (2015)Publication trends of study protocols in rehabilitation (2018)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Systematic review and meta-analysis in GI endoscopy: Why do we need them? How can we read them? Should we trust them? (2018)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Citation Discovery Tools for Conducting Adaptive Meta-analyses to Update Systematic Reviews (2016)The effect of internet use on well-being: Meta-analysis (2016)The environmental turbulence concept in marketing: A look back and a look ahead (2023)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)A meta-analytic approach to evaluating the explanatory adequacy of theories (2022)Reliability and reproducibility of systematic reviews informing the 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: a pilot study (2024)The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments (1980)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Promotion and caution in research article abstracts: The use of positive, negative and hedge words across disciplines and rankings (2023)Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology (2025)From Integrity to Inflation: Ethical and Unethical Citation Practices in Academic Publishing (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2007Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional study52 cited
  • 2015Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis39 cited
  • 2008Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis39 cited
  • 2022Citation bias: questionable research practice or scientific misconduct?37 cited
  • 2020Impact of review method on the conclusions of clinical reviews: A systematic review on dietary interventions in depression as a case in point28 cited
  • 2014Editorial: Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature22 cited
  • 2012Systematic Reviews for Informing Rehabilitation Practice: An Introduction20 cited
  • 2007Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in coloproctology: interpretation and potential pitfalls19 cited
  • 2020Systematic review and narrative review lead experts to different cancer trial predictions: a randomized trial10 cited
  • 2021Systematic reviews in hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapy: considerations and guidance from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research late effects and quality of life working committee10 cited
  • 2012Six concerns about the data in aid debates: applying an epidemiological perspective to the analysis of aid effectiveness in health and development7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work