Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Peer Review Evaluation Process of Marie Curie Actions under EU’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research

16 references·8 citing·48 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1994The earth is round (p < .05).3,999 cited
2011Social Knowledge in the Making626 cited
1991The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation496 cited
1999On Average Deviation Indices for Estimating Interrater Agreement462 cited
2007Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies312 cited
2008Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.299 cited
2000Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?254 cited
2001Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses231 cited
2015Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?225 cited
1998Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?146 cited
2007Does the Measure of Dispersion Matter in Multilevel Research? A Comparison of the Relative Performance of Dispersion Indexes140 cited
2003A Multilevel Cross-Classified Modelling Approach to Peer Review of Grant Proposals: The Effects of Assessor and Researcher Attributes on Assessor Ratings139 cited
2011Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel134 cited
2007

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications

99 cited

2011Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals87 cited

2012Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach82 cited

Cited by

2019Effects of seniority, gender and geography on the bibliometric output and collaboration networks of European Research Council (ERC) grant recipients32 cited
2021A retrospective analysis of the peer review of more than 75,000 Marie Curie proposals between 2007 and 201826 cited
2022Conditions that do or do not disadvantage interdisciplinary research proposals in project evaluation24 cited
2021Does reviewing experience reduce disagreement in proposals evaluation? Insights from Marie Skłodowska-Curie and COST Actions19 cited
2017Peer Review Practices for Evaluating Biomedical Research Grants: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association15 cited
2022What makes or breaks competitive research proposals? A mixed-methods analysis of research grant evaluation reports12 cited
2019The changing research landscape and reflections on national research assessment in the future12 cited
2021Face-to-face panel meetings versus remote evaluation of fellowship applications: simulation study at the Swiss National Science Foundation10 cited