SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Role of editors and journals in detecting and preventing scientific misconduct: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
0 references·16 citing·44 second hop
Role of editors and journals in detecting and preventing scientific misconduct: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. (2007)Role of editors and journals in detecting…ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНЕ ТА ЕТИЧНЕ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ШТУЧНОГО ІНТЕЛЕКТУ В ДОСЛІДНИЦЬКІЙ І ПУБЛІКАЦІЙНІЙ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ (2024)ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНЕ ТА ЕТИЧНЕ ВИКОР…Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review (2021)Practices for Research Integr…CONSIDERACIONES ÉTICAS EN EL PROCESO DE UNA PUBLICACIÓN CIENTÍFICA (2019)CONSIDERACIONES ÉTICAS EN EL …Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control (2018)Scientific misconduct at an e…Responsible Conduct of Research (2017)Responsible Conduct of Resear…Journal editors as philosopher kings: duties and responsibilities of academics in a changing world (2017)Journal editors as philosophe…Misconduct, Marginality and Editorial Practices in Management, Business and Economics Journals (2016)Misconduct, Marginality and E…High time for a common plagiarism detection system (2015)High time for a common plagia…Do Croatian open access journals support ethical research? Content analysis of instructions to authors (2015)Do Croatian open access journ…Retractions of scientific publications: responsibility and accountability (2014)Retractions of scientific pub…Publication Ethics in Biomedical Journals from Countries in Central and Eastern Europe (2013)Publication Ethics in Biomedi…Principles and Ethics in Scientific Communication in Biomedicine (2013)Principles and Ethics in Scie…Bridging knowledge translation gap in health in developing countries: visibility, impact and publishing standards in journals from the Eastern Mediterranean (2012)Bridging knowledge translatio…Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science (2010)Editors as gatekeepers of res…Analysis of a number and type of publications that editors publish in their own journals: case study of scholarly journals in Croatia (2010)Analysis of a number and type…The Purpose of Scientific Journals: Small is Important (2009)The Purpose of Scientific Jou…The Responsible Conduct of Research (2001)Ethics and scientific publication (2005)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Plagiarism under a Magnifying-Glass. (2017)Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? (2007)Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey (2009)Committee on publication ethics (2010)International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Do Editorial Board Members in Library and Information Science Publish Disproportionately in the Journals for Which They Serve as Board Members? (2015)Editorial Board Self-Publishing Rates in Czech Economic Journals (2017)Editorial board interlocking in knowledge management and intellectual capital research field (2018)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Small scientific journals from small countries: breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy. (1999)Good editorial practice: editors as educators. (2001)Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors (2006)Ethical Assurance Statements in Political Science Journals (2012)Peer Review in Scholarly Biomedical Journals: a Few Things that Make a Big Difference (2013)The Existence of Stealth Corrections in Scientific Literature—A Threat to Scientific Integrity (2025)The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields (1983)Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects (1986)The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (2004)An RQDA-based constructivist methodology for qualitative research (2017)An Analysis of Retracted Articles with Authors or Co-authors from the African Region: Possible Implications for Training and Awareness Raising (2020)Critical essay: Blinding faith – Paradoxes and pathologies of opacity in peer review (2021)Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory (1988)Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 1990 (1999)Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers’ reflections on reporting misconduct (2018)Academic research integrity: Exploring researchers’ perceptions of responsibilities and enablers (2020)Experimental networks for business model innovation: A way for incumbents to navigate sustainability transitions? (2021)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Ethical Aspects and Dilemmas of Preparing, Writing and Publishing of the Scientific Papers in the Biomedical Journals (2012)Personal Argumention in the Scholarly Publication (2020)Pautas para la elaboración de un artículo científico modelo IMRyD (2022)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts (2021)Designing and implementing a research integrity promotion plan: Recommendations for research funders (2022)Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2018Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control44 cited
  • 2016Misconduct, Marginality and Editorial Practices in Management, Business and Economics Journals40 cited
  • 2021Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review37 cited
  • 2010Analysis of a number and type of publications that editors publish in their own journals: case study of scholarly journals in Croatia28 cited
  • 2014Retractions of scientific publications: responsibility and accountability25 cited
  • 2010Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science22 cited
  • 2019CONSIDERACIONES ÉTICAS EN EL PROCESO DE UNA PUBLICACIÓN CIENTÍFICA19 cited
  • 2009The Purpose of Scientific Journals: Small is Important18 cited
  • 2013Principles and Ethics in Scientific Communication in Biomedicine18 cited
  • 2013Publication Ethics in Biomedical Journals from Countries in Central and Eastern Europe18 cited
  • 2015Do Croatian open access journals support ethical research? Content analysis of instructions to authors16 cited
  • 2017Responsible Conduct of Research16 cited
  • 2012Bridging knowledge translation gap in health in developing countries: visibility, impact and publishing standards in journals from the Eastern Mediterranean

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

14 cited
  • 2015High time for a common plagiarism detection system14 cited
  • 2024ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНЕ ТА ЕТИЧНЕ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ШТУЧНОГО ІНТЕЛЕКТУ В ДОСЛІДНИЦЬКІЙ І ПУБЛІКАЦІЙНІЙ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ13 cited
  • 2017Journal editors as philosopher kings: duties and responsibilities of academics in a changing world12 cited