SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Coping with the Biomedical Literature: A Primer for the Scientist and the Clinician
0 references·5 citing·23 second hop
Coping with the Biomedical Literature: A Primer for the Scientist and the Clinician (1982)Coping with the Biomedical Literature: A …Writing Manuscripts Describing Clinical Trials: A Guide for Pharmacotherapeutic Researchers (2001)Writing Manuscripts Describin…Derek J. de S. Price (1922–83) Historian of science and herald of scientometrics (1996)Derek J. de S. Price (1922–83…Peer review of the biomedical literature (1990)Peer review of the biomedical…An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials (1990)An empirical study of the pos…The peer review of manuscripts—In need for improvement (1986)The peer review of manuscript…Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (1979)Journal Peer Review (1985)Meta‐analysis in transfusion medicine (1997)Too many journals? Towards a theory of repeated rejections and ultimate acceptance (2015)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Heterogeneity in Meta-analysis of Data from Epidemiologic Studies: A Commentary (1995)Impact of Study Quality on Outcome in Placebo-Controlled Trials of Homeopathy (1999)Assessing the Quality of Randomised Controlled Trials (2001)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Dictionary of Scientific Biography (1981)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)Publication Bias: The Problem That Won't Go Away (1993)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Everything You Need to Know About Peer Review — The Good, The Bad and The Ugly (2019)Challenges in peer review: how to guarantee the quality and transparency of the editorial process in scientific journals (2023)Los desafíos de la revisión por pares: cómo garantizar la calidad y transparencia del proceso editorial de las revistas científicas (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1990An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials241 cited
  • 1990Peer review of the biomedical literature29 cited
  • 2001Writing Manuscripts Describing Clinical Trials: A Guide for Pharmacotherapeutic Researchers14 cited
  • 1986The peer review of manuscripts—In need for improvement12 cited
  • 1996Derek J. de S. Price (1922–83) Historian of science and herald of scientometrics9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work