Are Judges Human? Part One: The Effect on Legal Thinking of the Assumption That Judges Behave like Human Beings

Jerome Frank

36 citations0/0 files storedUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Judicial and Constitutional Studies Legal processes and jurisprudence Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies

Abstract

Jerome Frank, Are Judges Human? Part One: The Effect on Legal Thinking of the Assumption That Judges Behave like Human Beings, University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, Vol. 80, No. 1 (Nov., 1931), pp. 17-53

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 36 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2005American Legal Realism 2021Law and emotion: A proposed taxonomy of an emerging field (2006)2012Impartiality and Bias at the International Court of Justice 2018A Framework for the New Personalization of Law 2016Judges, ‘common sense’ and judicial cognition 2012MAPPING LEGAL RESEARCH 2015Building Legal Competency: Foundations for a More Effective Criminology and Criminal Justice Discipline 2022Framing Effects in Proportionality Analysis: Experimental Evidence

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.