SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Are Judges Human? Part One: The Effect on Legal Thinking of the Assumption That Judges Behave like Human Beings
0 references·8 citing·35 second hop
Are Judges Human? Part One: The Effect on Legal Thinking of the Assumption That Judges Behave like Human Beings (1931)Are Judges Human? Part One: The Effect on…Framing Effects in Proportionality Analysis: Experimental Evidence (2022)Framing Effects in Proportion…Law and emotion: A proposed taxonomy of an emerging field (2006) (2021)Law and emotion: A proposed t…A Framework for the New Personalization of Law (2018)A Framework for the New Perso…Judges, ‘common sense’ and judicial cognition (2016)Judges, ‘common sense’ and ju…Building Legal Competency: Foundations for a More Effective Criminology and Criminal Justice Discipline (2015)Building Legal Competency: Fo…MAPPING LEGAL RESEARCH (2012)MAPPING LEGAL RESEARCHImpartiality and Bias at the International Court of Justice (2012)Impartiality and Bias at the …American Legal Realism (2005)American Legal RealismLegalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational (2000)Agents or Trustees? International Courts in their Political Context (2008)In Whose Name? An Investigation of International Courts' Public Authority and Its Democratic Justification (2012)A circumplex model of affect. (1980)The Cognitive Structure of Emotions (1988)Emotion And Adaptation (1991)Strange encounters: Exploring law and film in the affective register (2008)Criminalising oppression or reinforcing oppression? The implications of veil ban laws for Muslim women in the West (2020)Constitutional Challenges in the Emotional AI Era (2021)Principles of Criminology (1955)Harvard Civil Rights: Civil Liberties Law Review (1993)Cultural cognition of scientific consensus (2010)The Republic of science (1962)What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences? (2004)Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game (2008)A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE (1955)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)‘The Research Says Perceptions on the Use of Social Science Research in the Family Law System (2018)Beyond Judicial Solitude: Listening in the Politics of Criminal Sentencing (2024)The Path of the Law (1897)Doubt in Islamic Law (1920)Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach (1935)3. Epistemology Naturalized (1969)Legal Realism for Economists (2009)A tool for measuring therapeutic jurisprudence values during empirical research (2020)Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication (1976)Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis (1992)Big Data for All: Privacy and User Control in the Age of Analytics (2012)Blockchain and institutional complexity: an extended institutional approach (2020)How Digital Power Shapes the Rule of Law: The Logic and Mission of Digital Rule of Law (2024)The impact of advanced AI systems on democracy (2025)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Algorithms in the court: does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated? (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2005American Legal Realism137 cited
  • 2021Law and emotion: A proposed taxonomy of an emerging field (2006)21 cited
  • 2012Impartiality and Bias at the International Court of Justice21 cited
  • 2018A Framework for the New Personalization of Law20 cited
  • 2016Judges, ‘common sense’ and judicial cognition17 cited
  • 2015Building Legal Competency: Foundations for a More Effective Criminology and Criminal Justice Discipline12 cited
  • 2012MAPPING LEGAL RESEARCH12 cited
  • 2022Framing Effects in Proportionality Analysis: Experimental Evidence1 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work