Commentary: Response to mcquillan and krashen (2008)

Tom Cobb

37 citations0/0 files storedLanguage learning & technology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Second Language Acquisition and Learning EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Reading and Literacy Development

Abstract

I was glad to receive a response from Jeff McQuillan and Stephen Krashen to my piece "Computing the Demands of Vocabulary Acquisition from Reading" (Language Learning & Technology, October, 2007), because drafting a reply forces me to be even more clear about what I am saying. I was initially surprised to see the lead responder was an expert in first language (L1) reading rather than second (L2) but on second thought McQuillan’s (The Literacy Crisis, 1998) participation makes sense.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 37 citations exist upstream.

References

1984How Many Words Are There in Printed School English?2006How Large a Vocabulary Is Needed for Reading and Listening?2006Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study 1988Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition 2005Learning L2 Vocabulary through Extensive Reading: A Measurement Study 1991Reading rate: a review of research and theory 2004Vocabulary in a Second Language 2004Developing reading fluency in EFL: How assisted repeated reading and extensive reading affect fluency development

Cited by

2010Is explicit vocabulary focus the reading teacher’s job?2011Applying L2 Lexical Research Findings in ESL Teaching

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.