Rating Evidence in Medical Literature

Opeyemi Oluwayemisi Daramola · John S. Rhee

35 citations0/0 files storedThe AMA Journal of Ethic

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Health Sciences Research and Education Clinical practice guidelines implementation

Abstract

Not all medical evidence is equally reliable. An overview of the grading systems used for sorting evidence on the basis of study design and quality by the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, and the journal of the American Academy of Family Physicians. Virtual Mentor is a monthly bioethics journal published by the American Medical Association.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials 2002Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence.

Cited by

2023Effectiveness of Different Online Intervention Modalities for Middle-Aged Adults with Overweight and Obesity: A 20-Year Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.