No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Introduction Freedom of association was not one of the founding principles and collective bargaining was not one of the operating mechanisms of the common market. It has not been easy to perceive in the emerging law of a European common market a role for collective organisations of labour and capital. Accompanying this conceptual disarray about the nature of the law governing collective labour relations at EU level has been scepticism as to the feasibility of development of a system of industrial relations at the level of the EU. The result has been a general pessimism about the prospects for collective labour law in the EU. Much of the confusion and some of the scepticism are due to the absence at EU level of legal measures and institutional and organisational structures recognisable in terms of traditional and familiar collective labour laws and national industrial relations systems. Instead, up to, and to some extent, even after the adoption of the Protocol and Agreement on Social Policy attached to the Maastricht Treaty on European Union, the collective labour law of the EU was to be found embedded in a variety of legal measures which did not have the regulation of collective labour relations as their primary objective. These measures include those aimed at harmonising national labour laws, or regulating the implications for labour of transnational economic activities.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 0 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.