SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Is There a Valid Experimental Argument for Scientific Realism? · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleIs There a Valid Experimental Argument for Scientific Realism?

Peter Achinstein2002

Article2002

Is There a Valid Experimental Argument for Scientific Realism?

Peter Achinstein

112 citations·0/0 files stored·The Journal of Philosophy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy and History of Science Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy, Science, and History

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 112 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2017Scientific Realism Made Effective 2020There Are No Such Things As Theories 2008Evident atoms: visuality in Jean Perrin’s Brownian motion research 2010The No-Miracles Argument for Realism: Inference to an Unacceptable Explanation 2012Natural Kinds and Naturalised Kantianism 2012How to Split a Theory: Defending Selective Realism and Convergence without Proximity 2014Expanding Our Grasp: Causal Knowledge and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives 2013Doing Away with the No Miracles Argument

Details

Year2002

Typearticle

Published2002-09-01

VenueThe Journal of Philosophy

ISSN-L0022-362X

Languageen

Citations112

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPhilosophy and History of Science

Identifiers

doi10.2307/3655684

openalex_workW9990754

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.