No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Die Frage nach den Bedingungen massenmedialer Öffentlichkeit in der EU wird in der akademischen Literatur kontrovers diskutiert. Von Autoren wie Grimm (1995), Schlesinger (1995) und Kielmansegg (1994, 1996) wird die Möglichkeit der Emergenz einer europäischen Öffentlichkeit2 schlichtweg verworfen. Ihre in den folgenden Zitaten zusammengefassten negativen Befunde lassen die Hoffnungen auf eine aktive Staatsbürgerschaft und auf Demokratie jenseits der Grenzen des Nationalstaats dahinschwinden: „At stake is the minimal establishment of a European news agenda as a serious part of the news-consuming habits of significant European audiences who have begun to think of their citizenship as transcending the level of the nation-state. Without such conditions obtaining, we could not meaningfully talk of an enlargement of the public sphere at this level. The implication of the argument above is that, in the process of media reception, even a multilingual rendition of a single given European news agenda is more likely to be diversely‚domesticated’ within each distinctive national or language context (...) than it is likely to reorientate an audience towards a common European perspective.“ (Schlesinger 1995: 25–26)
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 22 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.