SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleEvaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation

Jia Zhu2015

Article2015

Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation

Jia Zhu · Gabriel Pui Cheong Fung · Wai Hung Wong · Zhixu Li · Chuanhua Xu

6 citations·0/0 files stored·Science and Engineering Ethics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

References

1951Social Choice and Individual Values.1952Social Choice and Individual Values 2012Bias in peer review 2016The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review 1998US and Non-US Submissions 1998Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?1997Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation 1990The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2016Blind Peer Review by Academic Journalschapter · 19 shared references 2016Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journalarticle · 9 shared references 2017Peer Review: From “Sacred Ideals” to “Profane Realities”chapter · 7 shared references 2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer reviewarticle · 7 shared references 2001Evaluation of Peer Review in Biomedical Publicationeditorial · 7 shared references 2015Emerging trends in peer review—a surveyreview · 6 shared references

Details

Year2015

Typearticle

Published2015-07-13

VenueScience and Engineering Ethics

ISSN-L1353-3452

Languageen

Citations6

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s11948-015-9683-8

openalex_workW1123749422

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.