SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation (2015)Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different…The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)The Effects of Double-Blind v…Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors (2015)Ensuring the Quality, Fairnes…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewSingle- versus double-blind reviewing (2006)Single- versus double-blind r…US and Non-US Submissions (1998)US and Non-US SubmissionsPeer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1 (1998)Peer Review for Journals as i…Masking Author Identity in Peer Review (1998)Masking Author Identity in Pe…Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality? (1998)Does Masking Author Identity …Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation (1997)Peer review for journals: Evi…The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review (1994)The Effects of Blinding on Ac…The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. (1990)The effects of blinding on th…The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial (1990)The effects of blinding on th…How blind is blind review? (1984)How blind is blind review?Rational Man and Irrational Society (1982)Rational Man and Irrational S…Social Choice and Individual Values (1952)Social Choice and Individual …Social Choice and Individual Values. (1951)Social Choice and Individual …The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists (1994)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research (2023)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Principles of forecasting : a handbook for researchers and practitioners (2001)Principles of Forecasting (2001)Scientific Utopia (2012)Chapter 48 Race and gender in the labor market (1999)Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians (2000)Women in Academic Science (2014)Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS? (1991)The interdisciplinary study of coordination (1994)Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology (1999)A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System (1954)Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators (2005)Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide (2008)A doctoral student of physics writing for publication: A sociopolitically-oriented case study (2006)We Have to Break Up (2009)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance and Resource Allocation in Science (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1951Social Choice and Individual Values.7,792 cited
  • 1952Social Choice and Individual Values4,699 cited
  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 2016The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review425 cited
  • 1998US and Non-US Submissions318 cited
  • 1998Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?278 cited
  • 1997Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation262 cited
  • 1990The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial216 cited
  • 1998Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1195 cited
  • 1994The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review164 cited
  • 1982Rational Man and Irrational Society161 cited
  • 2015Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors161 cited
  • 1984How blind is blind review?125 cited
  • 2006Single- versus double-blind reviewing118 cited
  • 1990The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial.113 cited
  • 1998

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Masking Author Identity in Peer Review
104 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.