State of the psychological contract

Richard Winter · Brent A. Jackson

41 citations0/0 files storedEmployee Relations

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Employee Performance and Management Higher Education and Employability

Abstract

Purpose To identify and describe work environment conditions that give rise to a shared or different state of the psychological contract for managers and employees. Design/methodology/approach Semi‐structured interviews conducted with seven managers and 12 employees within an Australian credit union. Questions relate to the causes (work environment conditions) and content (salary, recognition and rewards, trust and fairness, open/honest communication) of the psychological contract. Comparative analysis techniques identify and contrast psychological contract categories of managers and employees. Findings Although managers and employees shared similar responses as to the state of the psychological contract, they attributed different causes to these states. Managers tended to construct rational explanations and emphasise resource constraints and financial considerations, whilst employees constructed emotional explanations and attributed this situation to an unfair, uncaring or distant management. Employees regarded the Staff Consultative Committee and open‐door policies as “symbolic acts” rather than genuine attempts to give employees a voice in the company. Practical implications Aligning the psychological contract espoused by management more closely with that upheld by employees requires managers to adopt more personal, face‐to‐face communication strategies. The removal of status‐related barriers to communication places managers in a better position to explain to employees how the organisation can meet (or not) specific contract expectations and obligations. Originality/value Paper provides interesting insights into how contracts form within the context of work environment, HRM policy and practice, and cultural factors – work context factors largely ignored by psychological contract researchers.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 41 citations exist upstream.

References

1992Basics of Qualitative Research 2017Exchange and Power in Social Life 1960The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement 1990Basics of qualitative research 1996Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm 2002Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature.1989Psychological and implied contracts in organizations 1995Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements

Cited by

2019The impact of psychological contracts on employee engagement at a university of technology 2021Testing the link between psychological contract, innovative behavior and multidimensional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic 2015The impact of customer participation: the employee’s perspective 2009Building Self and Community: The Career Experiences of a Hotel Executive Housekeeper 2009Employee evaluations of occupational pensions 2012

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.