SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication
16 references·16 citing·45 second hopsampled
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication (2016)Interventions to prevent misconduct and p…Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Recommendations for the condu…The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior (2014)The Influence of Attitudes on…Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)Consolidated standards of rep…Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Recommendations for examining…Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews (2011)Checking reference lists to f…How Many Studies Do You Need? (2009)How Many Studies Do You Need?How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots (2008)Reasons or excuses for avoidi…Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)Contour-enhanced meta-analysi…Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)Fostering integrity in resear…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints (2005)A modified test for small‐stu…Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review (2001)Efficacy of the Theory of Pla…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Evaluation of Training (1993)Evaluation of TrainingTRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK. (1967)TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT HAND…Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices (2021)Towards a Research Agenda for…Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on? (2021)Strengthening research integr…Interventions for Organizational Climate and Culture in Academia: A Scoping Review (2021)Interventions for Organizatio…Effective Strategies for Research Integrity Training—a Meta-analysis (2021)Effective Strategies for Rese…Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study (2021)Education and training polici…What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity (2020)What Research Institutions Ca…Researchers’ Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study (2020)Researchers’ Perceptions of a…On the use of blockchain-based mechanisms to tackle academic misconduct (2019)On the use of blockchain-base…A Decade of Empirical Research on Research Integrity: What Have We (Not) Looked At? (2019)A Decade of Empirical Researc…The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures (2018)The peer review game: an agen…Researchers’ interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study (2018)Researchers’ interpretations …Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians (2018)Researcher Requests for Inapp…How researchers perceive research misconduct in biomedicine and how they would prevent it: A qualitative study in a small scientific community (2018)How researchers perceive rese…In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists’ Engagement in Questionable Research Practices (2017)In Defense of the Questionabl…A Systematic Review Into the Psychological Causes and Correlates of Plagiarism (2017)A Systematic Review Into the …Irreproducibility of published bioscience research: Diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapy (2016)Irreproducibility of publishe…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis (2006)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The theory of planned behavior (1991)A power primer. (1992)Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (1999)Nature and Operation of Attitudes (2001)Perceived Behavioral Control, Self‐Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1 (2002)The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections (2011)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review (2010)GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias (2011)Quantifying Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2017)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)A Global Perspective on Child Sexual Abuse: Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Around the World (2011)On the costs and benefits of emotional labor: A meta-analysis of three decades of research. (2011)Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2017)THE INFLUENCE OF TRAINEE ATTITUDES ON TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS: TEST OF A MODEL (1986)Applying trained skills on the job: The importance of the work environment. (1995)The flawed four‐level evaluation model (1996)INFLUENCES OF INDIVIDUAL AND SITUATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS ON MEASURES OF TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS. (1992)Factors That Influence Skill Decay and Retention: A Quantitative Review and Analysis (1998)Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. (2006)The Advantages of an Inclusive Definition of Attitude (2007)Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework (2011)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2001Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review9,964 cited
  • 2011Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials7,681 cited
  • 2005A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints2,270 cited
  • 2008Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry2,046 cited
  • 2014The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior1,918 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2009How Many Studies Do You Need?1,293 cited
  • 1967TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK.925 cited
  • 1993Evaluation of Training905 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 2015Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals739 cited
  • 2012Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals739 cited
  • 2008Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

457 cited
  • 2011Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews445 cited
  • 2006Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions407 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity88 cited
    • 2019A Decade of Empirical Research on Research Integrity: What Have We (Not) Looked At?81 cited
    • 2021Effective Strategies for Research Integrity Training—a Meta-analysis75 cited
    • 2017A Systematic Review Into the Psychological Causes and Correlates of Plagiarism62 cited
    • 2021Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices57 cited
    • 2018Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians54 cited
    • 2018The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures53 cited
    • 2018Researchers’ interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study51 cited
    • 2020Researchers’ Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study51 cited
    • 2021Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on?48 cited
    • 2016Irreproducibility of published bioscience research: Diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapy46 cited
    • 2019On the use of blockchain-based mechanisms to tackle academic misconduct45 cited
    • 2018How researchers perceive research misconduct in biomedicine and how they would prevent it: A qualitative study in a small scientific community44 cited
    • 2017In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists’ Engagement in Questionable Research Practices41 cited
    • 2021Interventions for Organizational Climate and Culture in Academia: A Scoping Review39 cited
    • 2021Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study39 cited